Materials Science vs. Physics How do they complement each other?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the collaboration between physicists and materials scientists in advancing novel materials and nanotechnology. Materials scientists focus on experimental work, applying fundamental principles to develop new materials, while condensed matter and solid-state physicists concentrate on theoretical frameworks and understanding material properties at the atomic level. Their collaboration is essential in the lab, as physicists provide the theoretical basis that informs the experimental approaches of materials scientists. Additionally, computational materials design is highlighted as a growing field, with a strong emphasis on the role of physics in nanotechnology and materials science. For those interested in entering this interdisciplinary area, a physics major supplemented with materials science courses is considered a solid foundation, particularly for those leaning towards the theoretical aspects of nanoscience.
cytochrome
Messages
163
Reaction score
3
Which field of science is at the forefront in the design of novel materials (biomaterials, semiconductors, energetic materials, etc.) and nanotechnology?

I would imagine that physicists and materials scientists work together to achieve the above goals, but can someone describe to me the role of each?

What do materials scientists do?

What do condensed matter and solid state physicists do?

How do they compliment each other in the lab?

Is there any other field that leads research in computational materials design and nanotechnology?

What would someone major in if they wanted to study this broad topic?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm also interested in this, I'd like to get in a field between them. Would a physics major be enough for getting into nanotechnology/material science?
 
I think majoring in physics would be better for nanoscience, which is basically condensed matter physics and/or molecular and atomic physics. Physics, therefore, would be better for the theoretical side of things.

A materials scientist would perform experiments and apply the fundamental findings of the physicists. I think a physics degree with some materials classes would be enough
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top