Materials to make skin friction negligible

AI Thread Summary
To achieve negligible skin friction for wind tunnel tests on a foam model, the surface must be made smooth and even. Experimentation with different coatings, such as primers and glossy finishes, is essential, as some materials may damage the foam. The focus should be on increasing the Reynolds number to minimize the impact of skin friction, especially when measuring drag. For lift measurements, ensuring a smooth surface will also help reduce skin friction effects. Conducting tests across various Reynolds numbers can confirm if skin friction is negligible based on the stability of nondimensional coefficients.
eng1234
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I need to run wind tunnel tests on a simple shape which will be made of foam whilst the skin friction is to be negligible. Is there easy ways of cover the model to achieve this ?

thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The best you can do is to make the surface smooth and very even. Spray paint may not work because it often "eats" foam before it drys.
With some experimentation, you might find some combination of liquids and sprays that will work. Like a primer followed by a glossy coat. Or maybe a glue followed by a glossy. It will depend a lot on what foam you are using.
 
Are you trying to measure the drag, or are you trying to measure lift? If you're trying to measure drag, it will be very difficult, and your best bet will be to try to get the reynolds number up as high as possible and make the surface as smooth as possible. If you're measuring lift however, it'll be a lot easier to ensure that skin friction isn't substantially affecting your results, though the procedure is the same (smooth surface, high Re). If you want to confirm that skin friction is small, run tests over a wide range of reynolds numbers and look at how your nondimensional coefficients are affected by changing Re. If your skin friction is having a negligible result on the aerodynamics, the nondimensional coefficients will not vary very much with Re.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top