Schools Math for Grad School: Beyond Physics Major Requirements

AI Thread Summary
Graduate schools in physics often prefer candidates to have a solid foundation in advanced mathematics, particularly for those interested in theoretical physics. Key subjects include real analysis, which is essential for understanding the mathematical frameworks used in advanced physics. However, the necessity of these courses can vary based on the specific area of specialization within physics. For applied physics, particularly in fields like semiconductor physics and optoelectronics, the relevance of advanced math may seem less direct. The discussion highlights a distinction between basic mathematical knowledge necessary for communication in physics and the deeper mathematical understanding required for advanced theoretical work. Ultimately, the choice of additional math courses should align with the student's career goals and the demands of their intended specialization.
id the sloth
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
Are there any specific math classes that grad schools prefer you take beyond the requirements of the physics major? I hear physics majors taking things like real analysis and other things I see no point in taking because of how little application I see. I'm pretty good with math in general and already have a copy of Boas.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
id the sloth said:
Are there any specific math classes that grad schools prefer you take beyond the requirements of the physics major? I hear physics majors taking things like real analysis and other things I see no point in taking because of how little application I see. I'm pretty good with math in general and already have a copy of Boas.

What sort of specialization (or pre-specialization) do you want to go into? Also are you talking grad school for physics and asking for advice about math subjects? (Just to clarify)
 
Applied Physics. Electronic stuff: semiconductor physics and devices, optoelectronics, nanoscale tech, etc. That's as specific as i can get at this point in my carrier.
 
I hear physics majors taking things like real analysis and other things I see no point in taking because of how little application I see.

Well, theoretical physics can be formulated in heavy mathematical language, assuming knowledge of the so-called bread and butter mathematics. Real analysis is obviously there, but it really depends what you want to do.

There are 2 levels of math - the level where you're learning a few nice results and learning how to communicate..and then the level where you're going above and beyond to produce something. I suspect strongly that for most theoretical physics, you needn't go beyond the first stage. The second stage starts to overlap with so-called Mathematical Physics.
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top