Math for Physicists: Preparing for Grad Level Physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter 6eecs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physicists
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the lack of a dedicated "math for physicists" course at the school, which raises concerns about preparedness for graduate-level physics that heavily relies on advanced mathematics. The individual has completed multivariate calculus, differential equations, and linear algebra but is considering additional math courses such as analysis, functional analysis, topology, complex variables, abstract algebra, and advanced calculus to better prepare. There is a debate on whether to take several extra math classes or to self-study using a book like "Mathematical Methods for Quantum and Classical Physics" by Byron, which is deemed rigorous yet relevant. The individual believes that the intermediate and advanced E&M courses will cover enough partial differential equations, reducing the need for an additional class. Ultimately, the focus is on balancing math coursework with physics studies to ensure adequate preparation for graduate-level challenges.
6eecs
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
At my school, we apparently don't have a "math for physicists" type of course, which summarizes all the more advanced math that physicists need to know. The only requirement is: multivariate calc (finished), differential eqn (finished), linear algebra.

I heard, however, that the grad level physics courses here uses a lot of math. So, in order to prepare for those courses, which of the following math subjects should I strongly consider taking? (among those grad level courses, I'm considering GR, advanced E&M, QFT, and Atomic/optical physics, solid state physics).

1. Analysis (proof-based course, uses Rudin)
2. Functional analysis (requires analysis)
3. Topology (requires analysis)
4. Complex variables (fairly basic course) , different from complex analysis (which is more advanced)
5. Abstract Algebra (requires linear Algebra)
6. Advanced calculus (more like calculus techniques&PDE's for engineers type of class)

A. Would you be able to rank by the importance of the following subjects, as it is relevant to my physics studies?

B. Would you advise me to entrench myself deeply into the math, even though I'm not a math major? There's an alternative to taking 3-4 extra math classes, which is to pick up a book like Mathematical methods for Quantum and Classical Physics by Byron, and learn it over the summer. I started it , and I like the style. It is mathematically rigorous, but still very relevant to my physics studies.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what about partial differential equations
 
Well, what I reasoned was that I'll get enough PDE's in my intermediate and advanced E&M course that I don't really think I need an extra class for that.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top