Programs Math for Physics PhD: Preparing for Top 10 PhD Programs

AI Thread Summary
A second-year university student is contemplating applying to a top 10 PhD program in theoretical physics and is seeking advice on necessary mathematics coursework. They have completed calculus, math methods, discrete mathematics, and linear algebra, and are considering real analysis and complex analysis in their junior and senior years, respectively. The discussion emphasizes that while taking additional math courses can enhance graduate school applications, it is crucial to choose classes based on genuine interest and relevance to their intended field rather than solely for boosting credentials. Real analysis is highlighted as essential for advanced mathematics, with suggestions for further courses depending on specific interests, such as topology for general relativity or numerical analysis for computational approaches. Additional recommendations include upper division courses in partial differential equations (PDE) or ordinary differential equations (ODE) to strengthen their mathematical foundation for graduate studies.
ResonantW
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I'm currently a second-year university student considering applying to a PhD program in physics.

I'm leaning towards theoretical physics, although I haven't really experienced enough to make a clear decision. I'm beginning to be involved in research with a theorist this semester, but I was wondering the sorts of math I would need to get into a top 10 physics PhD program.

I've already taken calculus, math methods, a discrete mathematics class, and linear algebra. I'm considering taking real analysis my junior year, and could probably take complex analysis after that during the senior year.

What other math should I take to increase my shots at good graduate schools? What math could I wait until graduate school to take? Should I expect to learn most of my formal math before grad school?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In my opinion, all top 10 schools are a far reach for everyone. Anything you do: more relevant coursework, research, extracurricular societies, etc will improve your chances, but I doubt it would be a significant enough difference. Know that you will be competing with several students who likely have much better credentials. Don't give up though. Its roughly an equal chance for everyone.

Also, it's a bit pointless to just take more math just to boost your chances. Take the extra math either because you love it, or because you see it particularly useful for your intended field in graduate physics.
 
Don't just take classes because it looks good. Take them because they'll help you.

What area are you interested in? Real analysis is required for a lot of upper division math (at least at my school). So real analysis, then whatever you want to take.

If you're interested in general relativity, topology would be super helpful. If you're interested in a more...computational approach, numerical analysis would be super helpful (numerical analysis is always helpful, regardless of area IMO). Real analysis isn't really the end (for some it is), I've seen it as the gateway to the really cool areas of math. You have to develop the real numbers (and calculus, of course) rigorously before you can do anything cool with them.

Also, upper div PDE or ODE class would be pretty useful.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top