MHB Math Help: Understand How to Compute $F_{X_1}(x)$

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the computation of the cumulative distribution function \( F_{X_1}(x) \) using the binomial distribution. The formula \( F_{X_1}(x) = \sum_{j=1}^n \binom{n}{1} F^1(x) (1-F(x))^{n-1} \) represents the probability of obtaining at least one success in \( n \) trials. It is derived from the complement rule, where \( F_{X_1}(x) \) is calculated as \( 1 - (1 - F(x))^n \). This indicates that the total probability for a specific value \( x \) sums to 1, confirming that \( F_{X_0}(x) = 1 \). The explanation emphasizes the relationship between the binomial distribution and cumulative probabilities.
WMDhamnekar
MHB
Messages
376
Reaction score
28
1655630667801.png


Now, I don't understand how did author compute $F_{X_1}(x) = \displaystyle\sum_{j=1}^n \binom{n}{1} F^1(x) (1-F(x))^{n-1} = 1-(1-F(x))^n ?$ (I know L.H.S = R.H.S)

Would any member of Math help board explain me that? Any math help will be accepted.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The formula $\binom nj F^j(x)(1-F(x))^{n-j}$ is the probability mass function of the binomial distribution with parameters $p=F(x)$ and $n$.
Consequently we have that all possibilities for a specific $x$ sum up to $1$.
It implies that $F_{X_0}(x)=1$.
We can use the complement rule $P(A^c)=1-P(A)$ to calculate $F_{X_1}(x)$.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top