Math in Physics vs. Math Courses: A 92 in Cal 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shackleford
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Courses Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on concerns about the difficulty of math used in a physics major compared to math courses, particularly after achieving a 92 in Calculus II. The participant expresses some uncertainty about their understanding of sequences and series, despite performing well overall. They reflect on their experience of not using a solutions manual and how it impacted their learning. There is reassurance from others that a strong grade indicates readiness for future challenges, and the concept of "math maturity" is mentioned as a natural progression in understanding. The participant plans to review their final exam and considers taking Linear Algebra next summer.
Shackleford
Messages
1,649
Reaction score
2
Will the math I use in my physics major be easier or harder than the math I use in my math courses? I just got an A in Cal 2 with a 92. Overall, I did mildly well, but obviously not perfect. I fully qualitatively understand what power series are and everything, but I guess there might be a fuzzy area or two concerning analytical evaluations of sequences and series? I don't know. Oh, also, I went the whole semester without having a solutions manual at my disposal. I will never do that again.

Or, am I worrying myself for nothing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pfff... I got a C- in Calculus II, but I understand it all now and I never even looked over it since!

I think with a A+, you're totally fine!
 
JasonRox said:
Pfff... I got a C- in Calculus II, but I understand it all now and I never even looked over it since!

I think with a A+, you're totally fine!

Well, I just looked at my final exam grade, and it is an 84. I thought I did a little better, though. I think that's why I'm feeling this way.
 
Nah, it's fine.

You're honest with what you know and what you don't know generally, so that's a sign of good student. The stuff that you don't know will click later naturally. It's like math maturity or something.
 
JasonRox said:
Nah, it's fine.

You're honest with what you know and what you don't know generally, so that's a sign of good student. The stuff that you don't know will click later naturally. It's like math maturity or something.

I suppose. Thanks for the input. I emailed the professor, seeing if I could take a look at my final somehow. Heh. From what I hear, Cal 2 is a pretty difficult course and Cal 3 should be a little easier. I'm not too sure about Linear Algebra, though. I'll probably take that next summer.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
6K
Back
Top