Math needed for graduate theoretical nuclear physics program?

AI Thread Summary
A roadmap for mastering the mathematics necessary for nuclear theory includes key areas such as Partial Differential Equations (PDE), Complex Analysis, Linear Algebra, and Numerical Methods. The individual has completed Calculus (1-3) and is self-studying Ordinary Differential Equations (ODE). They plan to use Arfkens' second edition of mathematical methods, which covers vector analysis and boundary value problems. Statistics is already a requirement for their studies, making it an essential part of their roadmap. Resources like MIT OpenCourseWare provide additional courses relevant to nuclear engineering, further supporting the learning path.
CarterTheSpaceman
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
So, basically I need a roadmap of the math required for nuclear theory. I've completed Calc (1-3) and teaching myself ODE. My roadmap currently is PDE, Complex Analysis, Linear Algebra and Numerical methods. I'm going to work through Arfkens 2nd edition of math methods. Any thing else I should really know?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Statistics? Boundary value problems?

MIT Open Courseware has a list of courses

https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/nuclear-engineering/

It looks like vector analysis would be useful too.
 
jedishrfu said:
Statistics? Boundary value problems?

MIT Open Courseware has a list of courses

https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/nuclear-engineering/

It looks like vector analysis would be useful too.
Statistics is already a requirement for me so that's why I didn't include it. Vector analysis is included in my math methods course and I'm fairly certain boundary value problems is covered in that and PDE
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
Back
Top