Math needed for high energy physics?

AI Thread Summary
Measure theory's relevance to high energy physics is debated, with some arguing it is not particularly useful. Instead, a focus on "physicist's maths" is recommended over more abstract mathematical concepts. Resources like Penrose's "Road to Reality" are suggested for their accessible approach to the necessary mathematical background. The discussion emphasizes the importance of selecting appropriate study materials and cautions against relying solely on online video lectures, which may not provide effective learning. Overall, the consensus leans towards prioritizing practical mathematical skills that directly apply to physics rather than delving into advanced theoretical mathematics.
RedX
Messages
963
Reaction score
3
How important is measure theory for high energy physics? My math skills are poor compared to my physics knowledge, so I want to focus more time studying math rather than physics, but I don't know what type of math to study. I can't find any online video lectures of things like differential geometry or group theory, but I found some online video lectures for real analysis that has a focus on measure theory. Although the lectures are free, it isn't exactly easy to understand for someone with my background in math, so it would be helpful to know whether the effort to learn it is worth it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i don't think measure theory wud be useful at all to high energy physics. on the other hand pick a good book on representation theory. but do not go for something with a abstract mathematical flavor ... for that you will need some more background and you will be back to square one. my advice wud be to forget about learning mathematicain's maths and focus on physicist's maths. believe me these two are sufficiently different that both feel uncomfy with the other flavor.

i do not have much exposure to physicist's maths, but whatever i have seen of penrose's road to reality, it contains some very good material on this flavor. read the part where he discusses the maths background. it is very good. he is a person well versed in both flavors so you can trust his judgement on what to put in such a book.

and online video lectures are entertainment not learning.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
102
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Back
Top