Math problem in Huygens-Fresnel principle

  • Thread starter Thread starter mensa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Principle
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Huygens-Fresnel principle and the integration process needed to demonstrate how a spherical wave point source emits light to point P. The formula U(P)=K*∫∫U(Q)*F(θ0,θ0)*exp{ikr}/r*d∑ is highlighted, with K defined as -i/λ and F(θ0,θ0) as the inclination factor. The user expresses confusion about the integration process and seeks clarification on how to approach it, indicating a lack of understanding of the underlying concepts. Suggestions for resources or books that explain these principles more clearly are requested. Overall, the user is looking for guidance to better grasp the mathematical integration involved in the Huygens-Fresnel principle.
mensa
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
in Huygens-Fresnel principle, U(P)=K*∫∫U(Q)*F(θ0,θ0)*exp{ikr}/r*d∑
K=-i/λ; F(θ0,θ0)=0.5(cosθ0+cosθ) is inclination factor; d∑ is a small part of any close surfaces; these are all include in any Beam Optics book

I want to demonstrate the spherical wave point source S gives out, all the d∑ in the spherical surface as Secondary Source, whose light come to point P, equals to S only

I don't know how to integrate,coz it seems to hard to me.
Please show the process. Any book involves is available too.Thanks
 

Attachments

  • 未命名.jpg
    未命名.jpg
    4.1 KB · Views: 479
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm so confused that no one could give me any answer...Is it because I didn't get the idea through? Please let me know...thx
 
I can't understand the formula U(P)=K*∫∫U(Q)*F(θ0,θ0)*exp{ikr}/r*d∑.
Can you express it more clearly?
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...

Similar threads

Back
Top