Mathematical Induction am I on the right track?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving by induction that the sum of the sequence defined by ai = b + i*c equals (n+1)(a0 + an)/2. The initial predicate P(n) is incorrectly defined as just an expression rather than a statement. The correct approach involves proving P(n+1) by adding the new term an+1 to P(n) and simplifying. Participants emphasize the need to incorporate the definition of ai in the proof and clarify that the predicate should represent the sum of the sequence. The importance of testing the base case is also acknowledged.
tangibleLime
Messages
71
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The sequence a0 -> n is defined by ai = b+i*c. Prove by induction on n that the sum of the terms in the sequence is (n+1)(a0 + an)/2.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I defined predicate P(n) as (n+1)(a0+an)/2.

My goal is P(n+1), which is (n+2)(a0+an+1)/2. I believe I may have made a mistake here. For some reason I think it might be (n+2)(a0+an+an+1)/2, but I'm not sure.

So to prove P(n+1), I take P(n) and add the new term to it, (an+1).
P(n) + an+1
= ((n+1)(a0+an)/2) + (an+1)
= ((n+1)(a0+an) + 2(an+1))/2

Obviously what I got here is not visually equal to P(n+1), but maybe I'm missing something simplifying-wise? Or did I make a mistake somewhere?

And yes, I know I also have to test the base case, which I can do easily.

Any help would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tangibleLime said:

Homework Statement



The sequence a0 -> n is defined by ai = b+i*c. Prove by induction on n that the sum of the terms in the sequence is (n+1)(a0 + an)/2.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I defined predicate P(n) as (n+1)(a0+an)/2.
Well, this itself is incorrect. The "predicate" has to be a statement or an equation, not just an expression. Your predicate should be "The sum of the n terms in the sequence is (n+1)(a_0+ a_n)/2.

My goal is P(n+1), which is (n+2)(a0+an+1)/2. I believe I may have made a mistake here. For some reason I think it might be (n+2)(a0+an+an+1)/2, but I'm not sure.
No, you were right the first time- although, again, P(n+1) should be the statement that the sum of n+1 terms is equal to that.

So to prove P(n+1), I take P(n) and add the new term to it, (an+1).
P(n) + an+1
= ((n+1)(a0+an)/2) + (an+1)
= ((n+1)(a0+an) + 2(an+1))/2

Obviously what I got here is not visually equal to P(n+1), but maybe I'm missing something simplifying-wise? Or did I make a mistake somewhere?
You haven't used the fact that a_i= b+ ic!

Your predicate really is
\sum_{i=0}^n b+ ic= (n+1)\frac{b+ (b+ nc)}{2}= (n+1)\frac{2b+ nc}{2}

That's what you really want to prove.

And yes, I know I also have to test the base case, which I can do easily.

Any help would be appreciated!
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top