How Much Extra Rope is Needed to Raise it One Meter Above the Earth?

AI Thread Summary
To raise a rope tied around the Earth one meter above the surface, an additional 2π meters of rope is required, regardless of the object's shape. This principle holds true even for non-circular objects, provided they are convex. Participants in the discussion noted that many were able to solve the problem on their first attempt, with a majority of university students answering correctly. The problem's simplicity and the consistent mathematical reasoning behind it were highlighted. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the straightforward nature of the calculation involved.
kash25
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I'm collecting some data for school and need data from as many people as possible. Thanks!

Who can solve this problem in one try without looking at the answer?A fool wants to tie a rope around the earth. So he buys a rope of 40,000 KM and ties it around the world. His neighbour, also a fool, wants to do the same only he wants the rope on sticks 1 meter above the ground.

How much more rope does he need?

And how much more rope do you need when you use a tennis ball instead of the earth?Be honest! And be sure to leave a post saying whether or not you get it on the first try!

The answer can be found at http://mindcipher.com/puzzle/42-don-t-hang-yourself

Thanks for your help!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If the circumference of the Earth is 40,000 then the radius is \frac{20000}{\pi}. So the circumference in the second instance is 2 \pi \left(\frac{20000}{\pi} + \frac{1}{1000}\right) = 40000 + \frac{\pi}{500}. Obviously a tennis ball would be the same thing. That was my first try.
 
He needs an extra 2\pi metres of rope, regardless of the radius of the object it was wrapped around.

First try, although I have seen this problem before. (I got it the first try then as well.)I believe that even if you wrap the rope around a non-circular object (with reasonable restrictions; using a convex object will suffice), you would still have to add 2\pi metres to make each point on the rope 1 metre from the object.
 
We actually had a discussion on this after a math society meeting (I've seen the question before and answered it on my first try for the record). 9 out of 10 university students were able to get the answer right on the first try, the 10th took 10 minutes of explaining because "your notation is stupid"
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top