Mathematics for a physics undergraduate

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on recommendations for additional mathematics study for a second-year theoretical physics student at the University of Nottingham, who is preparing for general relativity and plans to pursue a PhD in particle theory. Key topics suggested for study include differential geometry, which is essential for general relativity, and representation theory, particularly for high-energy particle theory. The student has a solid foundation in various mathematical concepts, including ODEs, Fourier transforms, and basic tensor calculus. It is advised to either learn differential geometry through dedicated math books or concurrently while studying general relativity, as many GR texts cover necessary mathematical concepts. Additionally, contour integration and the residue theorem are highlighted as important topics to master. Overall, the emphasis is on building a strong mathematical background to support advanced studies in theoretical physics.
woody4064
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I have just finished my second year of a theoretical physics degree (MPhys) at the University of Nottingham in the UK. I now have three months with relatively few commitments, and would like to learn some additional maths that would be useful, but am unsure what topics I should study. Given that I do a lot of general relativity over the next two years, and I hope to do a PhD in particle theory, could anyone give me advice?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Differential geometry might be beneficial.
 
woody4064 said:
Hello,
Given that I do a lot of general relativity over the next two years, and I hope to do a PhD in particle theory, could anyone give me advice?

What do you already know?
 
WannabeNewton said:
What do you already know?

Nth order ODEs with constant coefficients, Fourier transforms, using Fourier and separation of variables to solve PDEs, very basic stuff on tensors (as in, I know what they are, I know tensor notation but the only one I've ever used greater than order 2 is the Levi-Civita tensor), generating functions, vector calculus, and enough calculus of variations to derive the classical Lagrangian. Fairly typical stuff for a second year theoretical student.
 
Presumably if you've seen Fourier series solutions to PDEs then you've also seen solutions to simple Sturm–Liouville systems using Legendre polynomials, spherical harmonics, and Bessel functions, particularly in the context of Frobenius' method in QM or Laplace's equation in EM? If not then you might want to pick that up from a book on mathematical methods in physics (e.g. Arfken). If you've gotten that down then make sure you also spend some time on contour integration and the residue theorem/Laurent series; you will also find this in Arfken.

I'm also assuming you know linear algebra inside and out at this point, which you probably do given that you're second year. Then as far as general relativity goes, the only thing you would really need to spend time on with regards to math is differential geometry. You can go ahead and try to learn it from a pure math book if you wish-you'll find tons of threads here and elsewhere suggesting books for that. Or you could just start studying GR now and pickup the differential geometry as you go along since all GR books will have a few chapters on the necessary aspects of it.

The only other thing I can think of that would be of great use to you is representation theory, if your interest is HEPT. You can again go the pure math route here but you would probably be much better served going through a book on rep theory that has a physics student in mind. Some time ago the user dextercioby recommend to me the following: https://www.amazon.com/dp/3211834435/?tag=pfamazon01-20 and I've found it to be absolutely brilliant so you should check it out.

Good luck!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top