Is Categorizing Mathematics into 10 Levels Effective?

AI Thread Summary
Categorizing mathematics into ten distinct levels is seen as an artificial division by some, as many mathematical concepts are interconnected. While traditional education often separates topics like algebra, linear algebra, and analysis, the reality is that advanced mathematics frequently overlaps these categories. For instance, graph theory employs advanced analysis techniques, and set theory has influenced non-standard analysis. The discussion suggests that a more integrated approach may better reflect the relationships within mathematical disciplines. Overall, the effectiveness of such categorization is questioned due to the inherent connections in mathematics.
Deicider
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
I saw somewhere that mathematics can be divided into 10 sections, i quote:

"1-Arithmetic
2-Basic Logic and Set Theory: proof techniques and reasoning, Sets,
operations on sets, mappings, binary relations (you'll need that
if you expect to go anywhere beyond arithmetic..)
3-Combinatorics and Elementary Number Theory
4-Basic Abstract Algebra: groups, rings, fields
5-Linear Algebra: Linear spaces, subspaces, linear mappings, matrices, polynomials
6-Affine and Euclidian Geometry
7-Basic Point-Set Topology
8-Analysis
9-More Linear Algebra
10-More Abstract Algebra"

How much of this is true?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
To be honest, I see no reason to make this categorization...

Of course, if you learn math e.g. at a university, you will have different subjects, like algebra, linear algebra, analysis, etc. However, after learning enough, you will see, that everything is connected with almost everything in mathematics. Graph theorists use extereme advanced analysis techniques, analysists often use algebraic tools, and set theorists created non-standard analysis (where the "infinitesimal" quantity is defined in a precise sense!) etc, so these categories are rather artificial in my opinon.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top