MHB Maths Mechanics (M1): Calculate Initial Velocity & Acceleration

  • Thread starter Thread starter Needhelp2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics
Needhelp2
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
This question is probably impossibly easy, but I have been staring at it for half an hour now, and don't seem to be able to get the right answer :mad:, so any help would be great!

A particle P moves on a straight line with constant acceleration. At t=0, P passes through the point 0 on a line. When t=20, P passes through a point A, where OA=220m and when t=50, P passes through a point B where OB= 250m and AB=30m.

Calculate the initial velocity and acceleration of P.

This is what I did:

I spilt it into two equations, with my first being- 220=20u +200a and my second being- 250=50u + 1250a (using the suvat equation s= ut + 0.5at2)
I then sub in u= 11-10a as u = 220-200a into my second equation to get 250= 550-500a+1250a, and therefore my a = -3/7ms-2.

In my answer book it says the the acceleration = -0.4ms-2, and so I gave up trying to find u... does anyone know where I went wrong ( or even is the book wrong- it can be very unreliable!)

Thank you!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Needhelp said:
This question is probably impossibly easy, but I have been staring at it for half an hour now, and don't seem to be able to get the right answer :mad:, so any help would be great!

A particle P moves on a straight line with constant acceleration. At t=0, P passes through the point 0 on a line. When t=20, P passes through a point A, where OA=220m and when t=50, P passes through a point B where OB= 250m and AB=30m.

Calculate the initial velocity and acceleration of P.

This is what I did:

I spilt it into two equations, with my first being- 220=20u +200a and my second being- 250=50u + 1250a (using the suvat equation s= ut + 0.5at2)
I then sub in u= 11-10a as u = 220-200a into my second equation to get 250= 550-500a+1250a, and therefore my a = -3/7ms-2.

In my answer book it says the the acceleration = -0.4ms-2, and so I gave up trying to find u... does anyone know where I went wrong ( or even is the book wrong- it can be very unreliable!)

Thank you!

Under constant acceleration \(a\) the position \(s\) at time \(t\) is:

\[s(t)=\frac{at^2}{2}+v_0t+s_0\]

where \(v_0\) and \(s_0\) are the velocity and position at \(t=0\).

Then you are told that:

\(s(0)=s_0=0\)

and so using this and the next thing you are told:

\(s(20)=200a+20v_0=220\)

and again:

\(s(50)=1250a+50v_0=250\)

which gives you the pair of simultaneous equations:

\(200a+20v_0=220\)
\(1250a+50v_0=250\)

to solve (multiply the first by \(5\) and the second by \(2\) and subtract), which has solution \(a=-2/5\) and \(v_0=15\)

CB
 
Ahh so my method was right, it was just a stupid arithmetic error somewhere! Thank you so much!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top