MHB Maths Mechanics (M1): Calculate Initial Velocity & Acceleration

  • Thread starter Thread starter Needhelp2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the initial velocity and acceleration of a particle moving with constant acceleration. The user set up two equations based on the particle's positions at specific times using the suvat equations but encountered discrepancies with the answer book. After reviewing the equations, it was determined that the correct acceleration is -2/5 m/s² and the initial velocity is 15 m/s. The user realized their method was correct, but they had made an arithmetic error in their calculations. This highlights the importance of careful arithmetic in solving physics problems.
Needhelp2
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
This question is probably impossibly easy, but I have been staring at it for half an hour now, and don't seem to be able to get the right answer :mad:, so any help would be great!

A particle P moves on a straight line with constant acceleration. At t=0, P passes through the point 0 on a line. When t=20, P passes through a point A, where OA=220m and when t=50, P passes through a point B where OB= 250m and AB=30m.

Calculate the initial velocity and acceleration of P.

This is what I did:

I spilt it into two equations, with my first being- 220=20u +200a and my second being- 250=50u + 1250a (using the suvat equation s= ut + 0.5at2)
I then sub in u= 11-10a as u = 220-200a into my second equation to get 250= 550-500a+1250a, and therefore my a = -3/7ms-2.

In my answer book it says the the acceleration = -0.4ms-2, and so I gave up trying to find u... does anyone know where I went wrong ( or even is the book wrong- it can be very unreliable!)

Thank you!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Needhelp said:
This question is probably impossibly easy, but I have been staring at it for half an hour now, and don't seem to be able to get the right answer :mad:, so any help would be great!

A particle P moves on a straight line with constant acceleration. At t=0, P passes through the point 0 on a line. When t=20, P passes through a point A, where OA=220m and when t=50, P passes through a point B where OB= 250m and AB=30m.

Calculate the initial velocity and acceleration of P.

This is what I did:

I spilt it into two equations, with my first being- 220=20u +200a and my second being- 250=50u + 1250a (using the suvat equation s= ut + 0.5at2)
I then sub in u= 11-10a as u = 220-200a into my second equation to get 250= 550-500a+1250a, and therefore my a = -3/7ms-2.

In my answer book it says the the acceleration = -0.4ms-2, and so I gave up trying to find u... does anyone know where I went wrong ( or even is the book wrong- it can be very unreliable!)

Thank you!

Under constant acceleration \(a\) the position \(s\) at time \(t\) is:

\[s(t)=\frac{at^2}{2}+v_0t+s_0\]

where \(v_0\) and \(s_0\) are the velocity and position at \(t=0\).

Then you are told that:

\(s(0)=s_0=0\)

and so using this and the next thing you are told:

\(s(20)=200a+20v_0=220\)

and again:

\(s(50)=1250a+50v_0=250\)

which gives you the pair of simultaneous equations:

\(200a+20v_0=220\)
\(1250a+50v_0=250\)

to solve (multiply the first by \(5\) and the second by \(2\) and subtract), which has solution \(a=-2/5\) and \(v_0=15\)

CB
 
Ahh so my method was right, it was just a stupid arithmetic error somewhere! Thank you so much!
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top