Notation of Matrices: Question from Niles

  • Thread starter Thread starter Niles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices Notation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the notation of matrices, specifically whether the alternative format (1,0 ; 2 -5)^T is acceptable for conserving space in reports. The consensus is that this notation is not standard and may lead to confusion, as traditional matrix notation is more widely recognized. Participants express concern over the importance of adhering to established conventions rather than prioritizing space-saving. The conversation highlights the need for clarity and consistency in mathematical communication. Ultimately, sticking to conventional notation is recommended for better understanding.
Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi

I have a question regarding notation of matrices. I am trying to conserve space in my report, so instead of writing my matrix fully like this
<br /> \left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c}<br /> 1 &amp; 2 \\<br /> 0 &amp; { - 5} \\<br /> \end{array} } \right)<br />
my plan is to write it as (1,0 ; 2 -5)^T. Is this notation correct? I must admit that I have not seen it being used before, and there might be a good reason for that.

Thanks for the help in advance.Niles.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
No, it isn't. Why would it be so important to save space?
 

Thread 'What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight'

Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
View full post »

Thread 'Non-orthogonal bases'

Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
View full post »
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'

Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'

I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Transforming coordinates between Cartesian and spherical
Replies
1
Views
2K
MHB Ice cream & yogurt matrices problem
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Symbol for matrix representative of a tensor
Replies
5
Views
3K
I Notation questions about kernel, cokernel, image and coimage
Replies
7
Views
686
MHB Serina's questions at Yahoo Answers regarding sigma notation
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Making Sense of Notation Confusion in Statistical Digital Signal Processing
Replies
6
Views
2K
A question about the proper use of certain notation
Replies
14
Views
2K
Understanding Conditional Expectation, Variance, and Precision Matrices
Replies
0
Views
764
I Why does the author use the notation ##f_c(d)## instead of ##f(c,d)##?
Replies
4
Views
2K
MHB Construct 3 Augmented Matrices for Linear Systems
Replies
2
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top