Matrix and inverse matrix question?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the equation A² = λA - 2I to find the inverse of matrix A without using the adjoint method. The user initially attempts to manipulate the equation by multiplying by A⁻¹, leading to A = λI - 2A⁻¹. However, they encounter confusion due to having two unknowns, A⁻¹ and λ. Participants clarify that λ can be deduced from the specific matrix A provided, simplifying the process. The key takeaway is to algebraically manipulate the equation to isolate I and factor out A to find the multiplicative inverse.
nishantve1
Messages
74
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


how do I solve this question
https://www.dropbox.com/s/bn958xnm5483s6u/photo%20%281%29.JPG
(This link if the image is not visible : https://www.dropbox.com/s/bn958xnm5483s6u/photo (1).JPG)
just so the equation is not clear it says A2 = λA - 2I

The inverse should be found through the equation in the question and not through the adjoint method

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



The equation says
A2 = λA - 2I
So, I mulitplied by A-1
This gives
A2 A-1 = λA A-1 - 2IA-1
{A-1 . A = I}

now the equation becomes
A = λI - 2A-1

I am stuck here since I cannot simply find A-1 by the adjoint method this equation has two unknowns A-1 and λ . Or maybe I am misinterpreting the question IDK
 
Physics news on Phys.org
But \lambda is not an unkown.

You are given a very specific matrix A. From your specific matrix A, and from your equation A^2= \lambda A- 2I, you can deduce what \lambda is.
 
How did I miss that . Thanks
 
I see no point in looking for specific values of \lambda. To find the multiplicative inverse of A:
1) algebraically manipulate the equation, A^2= \lambda A- 2I, to get "I" alone on the right.
2) factor out an "A".
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top