Matrix Diagonalization & Eigen Decomposition

NATURE.M
Messages
298
Reaction score
0
Do these terms practically refer to the same thing?
Like a matrix is diagonalizable iff it can be expressed in the form A=PDP^{-1}, where A is n×n matrix, P is an invertible n×n matrix, and D is a diagonal matrix
Now, this relationship between the eigenvalues/eigenvectors is sometimes referred to as eigen decomposition? Can someone clarify these terms for me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think eigen decomposition is another term for spectral decomposition in the spectral theorem. Although it is stated in a different way than diagonalizing a matrix, the spectral decomposition is related to the Schur decomposition for normal linear transformations.
 
NATURE.M said:
Now, this relationship between the eigenvalues/eigenvectors is sometimes referred to as eigen decomposition? Can someone clarify these terms for me.

For a matrix they are basically the same, but the concept of eigenvalues/vectors applies to other situations as well. For example the solution of ODEs and PDEs can involve infinite-dimensional vector spaces (and even uncountably infinite dimensional spaces), where "matrices" are not a very useful tool to work with.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top