Matrix elements of Hamiltonian include Dirac delta term

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the role of Dirac delta functions in the matrix elements of a generalized Hamiltonian, specifically in the context of non-equilibrium Green's functions as outlined in the textbook "Nonequilibrium Many-Body Theory of Quantum Systems" by Stefanucci. The generalized Hamiltonian is defined as ##\hat{h} = h(\hat{r},~\hat{p},~\hat{S})##, where ##\hat{r}## is the position operator, ##\hat{p}## is the momentum operator, and ##\hat{S}## is the spin operator. The matrix of the spin operator is represented as ##<\sigma | \hat{S} | \sigma' >##, with ##\sigma## being the eigenvalue of ##S_z##. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the implications of Dirac delta functions in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with Dirac delta functions
  • Knowledge of operators in quantum mechanics, specifically position and momentum operators
  • Basic comprehension of spin operators and their matrices
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Dirac delta functions in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the properties of generalized Hamiltonians in quantum systems
  • Learn about the application of non-equilibrium Green's functions in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the mathematical representation of spin operators and their matrices
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those focusing on non-equilibrium systems, as well as physicists interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum theory involving Dirac delta functions and generalized Hamiltonians.

MaestroBach
Messages
53
Reaction score
4
TL;DR
Currently reading a textbook on non-equilibrium green's functions and I'm stuck in chapter 1 where it recaps just general quantum mechanics because of dirac deltas included in the matrix elements of a generalized hamiltonian.
Currently reading a textbook on non-equilibrium green's functions and I'm stuck in chapter 1 where it recaps just general quantum mechanics because of dirac deltas included in the matrix elements of a generalized hamiltonian.

The textbook gives this:
Screenshot 2024-07-01 145152.png

I just don't understand how to think about the dirac deltas in this case, given that as far as I understand, it'll be a function that's 0 everywhere except where r = r' at which point it's equal to infinity.

For whatever reason, I can't get latex to work right now, but x = r * sigma, where sigma is the spin quantum number.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please provide the textbook.

Also what is ##\hat{h}##, ##\mathbf S##, the different ##\nabla##? Please define your variables.
 
Sorry, I should have provided a lot more context.

The book is Nonequilibrium many-body theory of quantum systems by Stefanucci,

##\hat{h}## is any generalized hamiltonian ##\hat{h} = h(\hat{r},~\hat{p},~\hat{S})## where "##\hat{r}## is the position operator, ##\hat{p}## is the momentum operator, and ##\hat{S}## isi the spin operator.

##\mathbf S## is "the matrix of the spin operator with elements ##<\sigma | \hat{S} | \sigma' >##", where ##\sigma## is the eigenvalue of ##S_z## so as far as I understand, it's essentially the same as ##\hat{S}##

The primed ##\nabla## applies to the primed variable.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pines-demon

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
10K