I Matrix elements of Hamiltonian include Dirac delta term

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the role of Dirac delta functions in the matrix elements of a generalized Hamiltonian in the context of non-equilibrium Green's functions. The Dirac delta function is characterized as being zero everywhere except at a specific point where it is infinite, which complicates the interpretation. The generalized Hamiltonian is defined as ##\hat{h} = h(\hat{r},~\hat{p},~\hat{S})##, with ##\hat{r}## as the position operator, ##\hat{p}## as the momentum operator, and ##\hat{S}## representing the spin operator. Additionally, ##\mathbf S## refers to the matrix form of the spin operator, while the primed ##\nabla## indicates differentiation with respect to a primed variable. Clarification on these concepts is essential for progressing through the textbook "Nonequilibrium Many-Body Theory of Quantum Systems" by Stefanucci.
MaestroBach
Messages
53
Reaction score
4
TL;DR
Currently reading a textbook on non-equilibrium green's functions and I'm stuck in chapter 1 where it recaps just general quantum mechanics because of dirac deltas included in the matrix elements of a generalized hamiltonian.
Currently reading a textbook on non-equilibrium green's functions and I'm stuck in chapter 1 where it recaps just general quantum mechanics because of dirac deltas included in the matrix elements of a generalized hamiltonian.

The textbook gives this:
Screenshot 2024-07-01 145152.png

I just don't understand how to think about the dirac deltas in this case, given that as far as I understand, it'll be a function that's 0 everywhere except where r = r' at which point it's equal to infinity.

For whatever reason, I can't get latex to work right now, but x = r * sigma, where sigma is the spin quantum number.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please provide the textbook.

Also what is ##\hat{h}##, ##\mathbf S##, the different ##\nabla##? Please define your variables.
 
Sorry, I should have provided a lot more context.

The book is Nonequilibrium many-body theory of quantum systems by Stefanucci,

##\hat{h}## is any generalized hamiltonian ##\hat{h} = h(\hat{r},~\hat{p},~\hat{S})## where "##\hat{r}## is the position operator, ##\hat{p}## is the momentum operator, and ##\hat{S}## isi the spin operator.

##\mathbf S## is "the matrix of the spin operator with elements ##<\sigma | \hat{S} | \sigma' >##", where ##\sigma## is the eigenvalue of ##S_z## so as far as I understand, it's essentially the same as ##\hat{S}##

The primed ##\nabla## applies to the primed variable.
 
  • Like
Likes pines-demon
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
6K