Matrix Homework: Solving for B in Statement 5

  • Thread starter Thread starter athrun200
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Proofs
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving matrix equations in a homework context, specifically addressing two parts of a problem involving a non-singular matrix A. For part a, it is established that the matrix B can be the inverse of A, satisfying the equation AB^2 = A. In contrast, part b raises the question of whether a single matrix B can satisfy A^2B = A for any non-singular matrix A, leading to the conclusion that no such universal matrix B exists. The importance of precise language in mathematics is emphasized, highlighting the distinction between the two parts of the problem. The discussion concludes with considerations on how to articulate the proofs and disproofs for the remaining parts of the homework.
athrun200
Messages
275
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


See question 5


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



For part a, it is very easy.
Multiply the inverse of A 2 times on both side, we can see the B=inverse of A.
i.e. The required B is inverse of A, then the proof is finished.

But how about part b?
It seems it is the same part a.

Is part b also correct?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Part b is quite different from part a- and the difference is important to learn. Mathematics must be very very precise in its wording- unlike science we don't have observations and experiments to fall back on. In other words, we can't just look at the real world- words are everything!

In part a it ask if, given a non-singular matrix A, there exist a matrix B such that AB^2= A. You are right- just multiply, on the left, on both sides by A^{-1}, which exists because A is non-singular, and the equation becomes AB= I. Yes, B exists and is the inverse of A.

In part B, it asks if there exists a matrix B such that, for any non-singular matrix, A, A^2B= A. "Any" is the crucial word there. Is there a single matrix B that is the inverse of all invertible matrices?
 
HallsofIvy said:
Part b is quite different from part a- and the difference is important to learn. Mathematics must be very very precise in its wording- unlike science we don't have observations and experiments to fall back on. In other words, we can't just look at the real world- words are everything!

In part a it ask if, given a non-singular matrix A, there exist a matrix B such that AB^2= A. You are right- just multiply, on the left, on both sides by A^{-1}, which exists because A is non-singular, and the equation becomes AB= I. Yes, B exists and is the inverse of A.

In part B, it asks if there exists a matrix B such that, for any non-singular matrix, A, A^2B= A. "Any" is the crucial word there. Is there a single matrix B that is the inverse of all invertible matrices?

Well, after listening to your explanation, I know part b is obvious wrong.
However, I wonder how to write it out.
 
"No, there does not exist a single matrix, B, such that A^2B= A for all non-singular matrices, A."
 
HallsofIvy said:
"No, there does not exist a single matrix, B, such that A^2B= A for all non-singular matrices, A."

Oh, this is the prove?
 
Let me try for part d.

Since A is non-singular, A^{-1} exists.
So \vec{x}=A^{-1}\vec{y} exists.

So, there exists \vec{x} s.t. A\vec{x}=\vec{y}

Again, how to disprove part c?
By simply saying NO, there doesn't exist?
 

Similar threads

Back
Top