Matrix representation of an operator in a new basis

AI Thread Summary
To find the matrix representation of an operator A in a new basis |ψj>, the relationship between the original basis |φn> and the new basis must be established using the unitary operator Unj. The matrix elements in the new basis are defined as Aij = <ψi| A |ψj>, which requires evaluating how Unj transforms the basis vectors. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly inserting the transformed basis vectors into the equation for Aij. Clarification is sought on how to approach the evaluation of these matrix elements and the role of the unitary operator in this context. Understanding these relationships is crucial for accurately representing the operator in the new basis.
peripatein
Messages
868
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let Amn be a matrix representation of some operator A in the basis |φn> and let Unj be a unitary operator that changes the basis |φn> to a new basis |ψj>. I am asked to write down the matrix representation of A in the new basis.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Should I try to evaluate <m|UnjA|n>? Is that how this should be approached?
I know that Unjn>=|ψj>.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. The definition of the matrix elements in the new basis is: Aij = <ψi| A |ψj>. This is what you have to evaluate.
 
I realize that, which is precisely why I asked whether I should evaluate the effect Unj has on the basis elements, namely through evaluating <m|UnjA|n>. Or thus I presumed. Am I totally off?
 
Not totally, but a bit. What is |ψj> and what is <ψi|? What happens when you insert these expressions into Aij = <ψi| A |ψj>?
 
Row and column vectors?
Aij are the elements of matrix A, I think.
 
I mean in terms of the original basis vectors. What happens when you insert this into what you want to compute?
 
I am not sure I understand what you mean by "inserting that into what I wish to compute". Please clarify.
 
Orodruin said:
The definition of the matrix elements in the new basis is: Aij = <ψi| A |ψj>
peripatein said:
I realize that, which is precisely why I asked whether I should evaluate the effect Unj has on the basis elements, namely through evaluating <m|UnjA|n>.
If you insert the definition of the |ψj>, this is not what you get. The definition is:
peripatein said:
I know that Unj|φn>=|ψj>.
 
Let's try this. I know that the i-th column is obtained through U|i>=|Ai> and <Ai|=<i|U. Is this somewhat closer to what you intended?
 
Back
Top