Matrix Theory....showing that matrix is Unitary

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cylers89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating that a specific matrix \( V \) is unitary. Participants explore the mathematical properties and manipulations necessary to show that \( V^*V = I \), engaging with concepts from linear algebra and complex analysis. The focus includes theoretical reasoning and mathematical proofs.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Participants define a unit vector \( x \) and express it in terms of its components, proposing to show that the matrix \( V \) is unitary.
  • Some participants suggest proving unitarity by demonstrating \( V^*V = I \) and discuss the implications of substituting \( z \) into this equation.
  • There is a discussion about the relationship between \( x \) and \( z \), particularly how multiplying \( x \) by a scalar of modulus 1 affects the properties of \( z \).
  • One participant mentions a specific expression for \( BB^* \) in terms of \( z_1 \) and discusses the challenges in simplifying the resulting expressions to show that \( V^*V \) equals the identity matrix.
  • Clarifications are sought regarding the choice of \( \theta \) to ensure that \( e^{i\theta}x_1 \) is non-negative, with explanations provided about the implications of this choice for the unitary condition.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the approach to show that \( V \) is unitary through the computation of \( V^*V \). However, there are differing opinions on the best method to implement substitutions and simplify the expressions, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved in terms of the most efficient approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the implications of certain mathematical steps, particularly regarding the substitution of terms and the simplification of expressions. There is also a lack of consensus on the interpretation of the conditions set by the problem regarding the choice of \( \theta \).

cylers89
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Let x be an element in space C be a given unit vector (x*x=1) and write x=[x,yT]T, where x1 is element in space C and y is element in Cn-1. Choose theta (element in space R) such that ei(theta)x1 greater than or equal to 0 and define z=ei(theta)x =[z1, BT]T, where z1 is element in R is non negative and B is element in Cn-1. Show that the matrix V is unitary.

V= [z1 B* ]
[B -I+((1)/(1+z1)) BB*]Can someone help me get off on the right foot?

I know that to show unitary, I can prove that VTV=I.
So I can do the VTV.

What I don't understand is how to implement what z= into my VTV. Would it be better to substitute in z1 in the beginning, or simplify VTV first, then plug in? Does (x*x=1) imply that it works for (B*B) as well?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cylers89 said:
Let $x$ be an element in space C be a given unit vector ($x^*x=1$) and write $x=[x_1,y^{\text{T}}]^{\text{T}}$, where $x_1$ is element in space $C$ and $y$ is element in $C^{n-1}$. Choose $\theta$ (element in space $\mathbb R$) such that $e^{i\theta}x_1$ greater than or equal to 0 and define $z=e^{i\theta}x =[z_1, B^{\text{T}}]^{\text{T}}$, where $z_1$ is element in $\mathbb R$ is non negative and $B$ is element in $C^{n-1}$. Show that the matrix $V$ is unitary.

$$V = \begin{bmatrix}z_1&B^* \\ B & -I + (1/(1+z_1))BB^* \end{bmatrix}$$

Can someone help me get off on the right foot?

I know that to show unitary, I can prove that $V^*V=I$.
So I can do the $V^*V$.

What I don't understand is how to implement what z= into my $V^*V$. Would it be better to substitute in $z_1$ in the beginning, or simplify $V^*V$ first, then plug in? Does $x*x=1$ imply that it works for $B^*B$ as well?
The condition $xx^*x = 1$ tells you that $|x_1|^2 + y^*y=1$. Since $z$ is obtained from $x$ by multiplying by a scalar of modulus 1, it follows that the analogous result holds for $z$, namely $z_1^2 + B^*B = 1$. Notice that in this case we do not need to put mod signs around $z_1$, because $z_1$ is real and nonnegative. Now compute $V^*V$, and then substitute $1-z_1^2$ for $B^*B.$ You should find that $V^*V$ is the identity matrix.
 
Last edited:
Okay, that makes sense. I do remember covering that in class. So I also know that BB*=(1-z1)(1+z1).

So for the matrix, after I multiply V*V...row1column1 easily is substituted to 1, since z12+B*B = 1.

Now I am getting tripped up on the canceling of row2column2 to 1.

The first one is: BB*+(-I+(1/1+z1)BB*)2
Substituting and squaring the binomial gets: (1-z12)+(I2-I+Iz1-I+Iz1+1-z1-z1+z12)
Combining like terms gives me: 2+I2-2I+2Iz1-2z1
This is where I am getting fuzzy...I cannot seem to figure out how to cancel this down to 1. It seems to overlap just enough that I am going in loops.

Now once I finish that part up, V*V will in fact be shown to be equal to the Identity matrix.

What does the directions mean by "choose theta in R such that ei(theta)x1 is greater than or equal to 0. and define z=ei(theta)x "...I'm not understanding what it is asking I guess.
 
cylers89 said:
Okay, that makes sense. I do remember covering that in class. So I also know that BB*=(1-z1)(1+z1).

So for the matrix, after I multiply V*V...row1column1 easily is substituted to 1, since z12+B*B = 1.

Now I am getting tripped up on the canceling of row2column2 to 1.

The first one is: BB*+(-I+(1/1+z1)BB*)2
(I may have confused you in my previous comment by writing $BB^*$ where it should have been $B^*B$. I have edited it to correct that.)

Okay, so the (2,2)-element of your matrix is $$BB^* + \Bigl(-I + \tfrac1{1+z_1}BB^*\Bigr)^2 = BB^* + I - \tfrac2{1+z_1}BB^* + \tfrac1{(1+z_1)^2}B(B^*B)B^*.$$

Replace the $B^*B$ that I have bracketed in that last term by $1-z_1^2$, and you will see that the whole thing reduces to $I$, as required. In a similar way, the off-diagonal terms in the matrix are both 0.

cylers89 said:
What does the directions mean by "choose theta in R such that ei(theta)x1 is greater than or equal to 0. and define z=ei(theta)x "...I'm not understanding what it is asking I guess.
In this problem, $x_1$ is a complex number, and any complex number can be multiplied by a complex number of modulus 1 (that is, a number of the form $e^{i\theta}$) so as to become real and nonnegative. The point here is that the computation to show that $V$ is unitary relies on the fact the element in the top left corner of the matrix is real. So you need a construction that replaces $x_1$ by $z_1$ in order to make $V$ unitary.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K