Max Acceleration of a Bungee Jumper

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the maximum acceleration of a bungee jumper who jumps from a height of 20 meters, with the bungee cord becoming taut at 17 meters below that point. Participants clarify that the maximum acceleration occurs when the cord is stretched 17 meters, not 37 meters. The correct formula for acceleration is derived from the net force equation, incorporating the spring constant and the jumper's mass. There is confusion regarding the values of acceleration, with participants attempting to reconcile the physics involved. Ultimately, the key takeaway is that the maximum acceleration must be calculated using the correct parameters and understanding of the bungee cord's behavior.
dhtml12345
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A bungee jumper of mass m kg jumps from 20 meters. The bungie cord's spring constant is k N/m. Let y = 0 be the point where the bungee cord begins to become taught, and let y = 20 be the jump point.

It is known that the point of maximum acceleration is y = -17.

Question: What is the value of the maximum acceleration?

Hint: The acceleration is not equal to gravity.

2. The attempt at a solution

F = ky - mg = ma
a = (ky - mg)/m [FAILS!]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks, but that didn't work.
 
The problem is a bit unclear about the altitudes used.
It says a jump from 20 m, but then they say that the cord only starts to become taught
at 20 m below the jump point, and the point of maximum acceleration (hence maximum length of the cord) is 17m below that. I hope the jump is from an altitude of at least 37m.

The method of you and anti-meson is correct. a = F/m = (kx - mg)/m, with
F = net force on person
k = spring constant = 100N/m
x = distance cord is stretched = 17m.
m = mass of person = 60 kg.
g = 9.81 m/s^2

only the distance should be 17m and not 37m

I don't see how you got 9.81, -9.81, 6, or -6 as none of them is the answer comes
from the equation with either 17 or 37 m.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top