I Max Amplitude Gravitational Waves: 2?

James Essig
Messages
68
Reaction score
2
I am curious as to what the maximum amplitude of gravitational waves is. I have read that the maximum amplitude as such is equal to two but I cannot seem to find again a reference that states this clearly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
James Essig said:
I have read that the maximum amplitude as such is equal to two

Where have you read that?
 
I am not sure. My memory seems to indicate that I read of the value of two in a Wikipedia article but upon searching related Wikipedia topics, I cannot find any verifying statements. Wikipedia is far from the most credible sources, so perhaps a more credible source is preferred. By a factor of two, I mean the extent of the space of maximum space contraction is 50 % of the extent of the space of maximum space expansion as a result of a passing gravitational wave.
 
I have never heard this before. I suspect that your recollection is mistaken.
 
James Essig said:
By a factor of two, I mean the extent of the space of maximum space contraction is 50 % of the extent of the space of maximum space expansion as a result of a passing gravitational wave.

I have never heard this either so I agree with @Dale that your recollection is most likely mistaken.

As far as a general answer to your question, gravitational waves are standardly treated using the linearized approximation of GR, which assumes that any perturbations of the metric are small; since the size of the perturbation of the metric is the amplitude of the gravitational wave, that would mean that the amplitude of gravitational waves should be small. Of course "small" does not have a precise definition; it depends on the problem and on how accurate you want your predictions to be. But generally speaking, if the perturbation is not small, the linearized approximation is no longer valid, which means whatever you're studying is no longer usefully viewed as a "gravitational wave"; it's a more general curved spacetime.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top