Max Depth of Submarine Modeling: 80kpa

AI Thread Summary
To model the maximum depth a submarine can reach under a pressure of 80 kPa, it's essential to understand hydrostatic pressure, which increases with depth. The pressure at a given depth can be calculated using the formula P = ρgh, where ρ is the density of water, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and h is the depth. Since 1 meter of water corresponds to approximately 10 kPa, a maximum pressure of 80 kPa allows for a depth of about 8 meters. Integrals are not necessary for this calculation, as the relationship is straightforward. Understanding these principles will help in formulating the required equation for the project.
HighHoAg
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello, I'm working on a project, and my teacher gave me something to think about, but I am at a loss. He wants me to come up with an equation to model the maximum height a submarine can go underwater, if it can withstand a maximum pressure of 80kpa. I started thinking it was an integral problem, integ(dP/dz) but I'm not sure. Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How does hydrostatic pressure depend on depth? (It's simpler than you think.)
 
it would be very cool if you solve that with integrals, but its a lot more than you need, really
 
What they said. No integrals required.

1m head of water = 0.1bar = 10kpa
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top