Max height, freely follwing question

AI Thread Summary
A freely falling object takes 1.5 seconds to cover the last 30 meters before hitting the ground. The height from which it fell is determined to be 32.8 meters. To solve the problem, one can use the equation v = at + initial velocity, assuming the object is released from rest. The discussion emphasizes the importance of applying relevant equations and solving simultaneous equations to find the solution. The approach involves understanding the variables and the object's motion during its fall.
georgelopez00
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A certain freely falling object requires 1.5s to travel the last 30.0 m before it hits the ground. from what height above the ground did it fall?
The answer is 32.8 m but i don't no how to get it. please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to at least have a go at the question or say what you think you MIGHT DO or perhaps what equations might be relevant... for all I know I might have spent as much time writing this reply as you have spent on the problem
 
loonychune said:
You have to at least have a go at the question or say what you think you MIGHT DO or perhaps what equations might be relevant... for all I know I might have spent as much time writing this reply as you have spent on the problem

i used the equation v=at+inital velocity. i figured the velocity is 0 m/s so i got the inital velocity as 14.7 m\s
 
Let's try to rethink the problem.

You have an object that is released from some height we do not know (32.8m according to your answer).
It travels for some length of time greater than 1.5 seconds.
During the FINAL 1.5 seconds it travels 30m.

You did not state in the question, but I'm assuming that the object is released from REST (i.e. when at the height 32.8m).

Now you know a few different variables in a couple of equations for different parts of the journey. Then it's a matter of solving simultaneous equations.

See this post, a very similar problem:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=252886
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top