Max Planck & Einstein: 1905 Paper on Energy Quantization

AI Thread Summary
The PBS documentary suggests that Max Planck sought out Albert Einstein in response to his 1905 paper on E=MC^2, but Einstein had also published a significant paper on the photoelectric effect that year. This earlier work on energy quantization likely influenced Planck's interest in meeting Einstein. Planck recognized Einstein's contributions to the special theory of relativity and attempted to bring him back to Germany as early as 1907. Despite acknowledging Einstein's brilliance, Planck was skeptical of the concept of light quanta, viewing it as a desperate measure to explain black-body radiation. Ultimately, Planck's reservations about quantum theory contrasted with Einstein's revolutionary ideas, which earned him the Nobel Prize.
hankaaron
Messages
83
Reaction score
4
In the PBS documentary on Einstein's E=MC^2, the story makes it seem as if Planck called on Einstein in response to Einstein's paper on E=MC^2 which was published in 1905.

But Einstein wrote an earlier paper on the photoelectric effect and the quantization of energy, also in 1905. Was it for this reason that Planck requested to meet with Einstein, instead of E=MC^2?

Thanks,
hankaaron.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As far as I know, Planck immediately acknoledged Einstein's early papers on the (special) theory of relativity. That was the reason why he tried to persuade him to come back to Germany as early as 1907. Finally, Einstein agreed to come in 1914 when he's been offered a job as a director of the Kaiser-Wilhelm Institute for Theoretical Physics which was a post without teaching obligations.

However, Planck never liked the idea of light quanta. For him it was an "act of desperation" to introduce them in explaining the black-body radiation spectrum. Since his own discovery he tried to find an explanation from classical electromagnetics rather than the quantum theory. He even said that Einstein's paper on the light quanta (which earned Einstein his Nobel prize in physics) is too revolutionary but that one has to excuse it due to Einstein's young age :-).
 
Just ONCE, I wanted to see a post titled Status Update that was not a blatant, annoying spam post by a new member. So here it is. Today was a good day here in Northern Wisconsin. Fall colors are here, no mosquitos, no deer flies, and mild temperature, so my morning run was unusually nice. Only two meetings today, and both went well. The deer that was road killed just down the road two weeks ago is now fully decomposed, so no more smell. Somebody has a spike buck skull for their...
Thread 'RIP George F. Smoot III (1945-2025)'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Smoot https://physics.berkeley.edu/people/faculty/george-smoot-iii https://apc.u-paris.fr/fr/memory-george-fitzgerald-smoot-iii https://elements.lbl.gov/news/honoring-the-legacy-of-george-smoot/ https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2006/smoot/facts/ https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200611/nobel.cfm https://inspirehep.net/authors/988263 Structure in the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer First-Year Maps (Astrophysical Journal...
Back
Top