Max Speed for 55kW Motor Lifting 4800kg Mass

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rumplestiltskin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Power
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the maximum speed of a 55kW motor lifting a 4800kg mass, with the correct answer being 1.2 m/s. Participants explore the misconception of using kinetic energy (KE) instead of potential energy (PE) in this context, emphasizing that the problem is fundamentally about power and the work done against gravity. The importance of identifying which energy type is changing—PE in this case—is highlighted as crucial for solving such problems. Additionally, the conversation touches on the necessity of understanding the relationship between power, work, and energy changes to avoid confusion in future calculations. Ultimately, the maximum speed is determined by the motor's power output and the gravitational force acting on the mass.
Rumplestiltskin
Messages
97
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


A 55kW motor is used to lift a 4800kg mass vertically up a mine shaft. What is the maximum possible speed that the mass could move upwards? Give your answer to 2 significant figures.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I correctly answered this as 55000 / (4800 * 9.8) = 1.2 m/s.
But first I went on a tangent rearranging KE = 0.5mv2 for v. Seemed like the most intuitive line of thought. Why was this mistaken? How would I avoid wasting time like that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rumplestiltskin said:
But first I went on a tangent rearranging KE = 0.5mv2 for v. Seemed like the most intuitive line of thought. Why was this mistaken? How would I avoid wasting time like that?
It's not going to work because there is no change in KE. The change is in PE.
That's intuitively obvious to me, but I have no magic formula to make it intuitive for you. Trying to analyse my own thought processes on the problem: it's a question about power, and power is the rate of work done; what work is being done?; it's the work in raising the mass against gravity, so it's the rate of change of PE...
 
  • Like
Likes Rumplestiltskin
haruspex said:
It's not going to work because there is no change in KE. The change is in PE.
That's intuitively obvious to me, but I have no magic formula to make it intuitive for you. Trying to analyse my own thought processes on the problem: it's a question about power, and power is the rate of work done; what work is being done?; it's the work in raising the mass against gravity, so it's the rate of change of PE...

Why would there need to be a change? If you knew the KE and neglected friction, couldn't you work out the velocity?
 
+1

For this type of problem you need to decide which is changing, the PE, the KE or both.
 
Rumplestiltskin said:
Why would there need to be a change? If you knew the KE and neglected friction, couldn't you work out the velocity?
How are you going to know the KE? You are not given KE, it is not changing, so the only way to know it is by knowing the velocity and mass, but the velocity is what you are trying to find.
I think this is the key intuition, that you need to look at what is changing.
 
haruspex said:
How are you going to know the KE? You are not given KE, it is not changing, so the only way to know it is by knowing the velocity and mass, but the velocity is what you are trying to find.
I think this is the key intuition, that you need to look at what is changing.

Would I be able to find if it were changing?
 
Last edited:
Rumplestiltskin said:
Would I be able to find if it were changing?
If the KE were changing? In that case the velocity would be changing, so you'd need to specify the question as velocity at some particular stage in proceedings.
 
haruspex said:
If the KE were changing? In that case the velocity would be changing, so you'd need to specify the question as velocity at some particular stage in proceedings.

Maybe not always; think a rocket burning fuel at constant velocity. But I see your point. I guess the intuition will come with practice.
 
Rumplestiltskin said:
Maybe not always; think a rocket burning fuel at constant velocity.
But there you are treating the rocket and remaining fuel as the mass. That is not a consistent object, i.e. it is not the same object from one time to another. You would have to include the exhaust fuel, which has quite a different velocity.
 
  • #10
The problem statement asks for the maximum velocity. There is only one maximum so the maximum velocity can't be changing. At any other velocity the power won't be 55kW.
 
Back
Top