Maxima and Minima of a function

n0_3sc
Messages
238
Reaction score
1
Are there any analytical techniques to do this besides the Derivative Test?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
There is no general method except by checking where the derivitive is 0 (or does not exist). For some functions, there are other ways. For example we can always find minima and maxima for quadratic functions by completing the square.
 
I see. Thanks for that.
 
But there is also possibility to estimate. If you solve some elementary function, for example:
f(x)=x^2+3x+2
You can transform it to form:
f(x)+\frac{1}{4}=\left(x+\frac{3}{2}\right)^2
So now you are able to find a minimum:
\min_{x\in\mathbb{R}}f(x)=-\frac{1}{4}
 
Yes, but my function is far too complex/tedious to do either way. An expression for the min and max has been found though proving it is too difficult for me.
 
lukaszh said:
But there is also possibility to estimate. If you solve some elementary function, for example:
f(x)=x^2+3x+2
You can transform it to form:
f(x)+\frac{1}{4}=\left(x+\frac{3}{2}\right)^2
So now you are able to find a minimum:
\min_{x\in\mathbb{R}}f(x)=-\frac{1}{4}

Well if you are working with quadratics a lot you should know that the min/max is going to be at \left(\frac{-b}{2a}, f\left(\frac{-b}{2a}\right)\right)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top