Maximal Ideal/Ring homomorphism question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zoe-b
  • Start date Start date
Zoe-b
Messages
91
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


So I have a question that says:

Let T:R -> S be a ring homomorphism, show that if J is a prime ideal of S, then

T-1(J) := { r in R s.t. T(r) is in J)

is a prime ideal of R. (I've done this bit)

It then says:
Give an example where J is maximal but T-1(J) is not maximal, hint: consider a suitable embedding T of a ring into a field


Homework Equations



First thing that doesn't really help is that I'm not so clear of what an 'embedding of a ring into a field' actually means in the first place. This is a phrase that crops up but has never been properly defined in my course.


The Attempt at a Solution



Ok so if I let R = integers and S = integers mod 7, then I think T taking a in Z to its equivalence class mod 7 defines an embedding of the integers into the field Z mod 7. However the only ideals in Z mod 7 are the whole field, and {0}. The pre-image of the whole field is clearly the whole of Z, whereas the pre-image of {0} is the set 7Z which is also a maximal ideal since 7 is prime. Bit confused, have tried a few other examples but can't get anything to work/understand the hint.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Zoe-b said:
Ok so if I let R = integers and S = integers mod 7, then I think T taking a in Z to its equivalence class mod 7 defines an embedding of the integers into the field Z mod 7.

An embedding is necessarily injective. Your mapping is not injective so it is not an embedding. For this problem consider the inclusion homomorphism \mathbb{Z} \rightarrow \mathbb{R} and recall that the only maximal ideal in a field is \{0\}.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top