Maximising X-Ray Image Quality with Minimal Dose Administration

AI Thread Summary
Minimizing the dose administered during X-ray imaging while maintaining image quality is a complex issue that depends on specific use cases. Factors such as exposure time and equipment design play crucial roles in achieving this balance. The clarity of the question is essential, as different scenarios require tailored approaches; for example, identifying a foreign object versus diagnosing a condition. Lowering dosage can compromise image resolution, which may be acceptable for certain diagnostic purposes. Overall, a more focused inquiry would yield better guidance on optimizing X-ray imaging with minimal radiation exposure.
Zinc
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
Does anyone of you know the ways in which dose administered to a patient can be minimised while still obtaining a useful X-ray image ?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Zinc said:
Hi all,
Does anyone of you know the ways in which dose administered to a patient can be minimised while still obtaining a useful X-ray image ?
This is an extremely broad question. You'll get a more useful answer if you narrow your question and indicate your area of interest. Do you want to design better equipment? Have you just been diagnosed with cancer and are worried about exposure in upcoming tests? These are very different.
 
Zinc said:
Hi all,
Does anyone of you know the ways in which dose administered to a patient can be minimised while still obtaining a useful X-ray image ?
"Useful" for what specific purpose?

You can turn the dosage way down (for instance, by turning down the exposure time) so that your image resolution is pretty crappy, but if all you're looking for is a steel screw in a patient's stomach, you'll still find it.

The question isn't very clear.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'

Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'

Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
View full post »

Thread 'Effective absorption coefficient of gold nanoparticles'

I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Image construction with concave and convex mirrors
Replies
4
Views
1K
B Huh? Seeing crisp vitreous floaters while using microscope
Replies
7
Views
2K
I Image appears outside of q -- Lens Maker's Equation confusion
Replies
17
Views
3K
A Larger X-ray dose in traditional X-ray of head vs. Head CT?
Replies
7
Views
3K
I Questions About Bragg's Law of X-Ray Diffraction
2
Replies
54
Views
9K
How did Becquerel discover the connection between phosphorescence and X-rays?
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Understanding magnification of concave mirrors for near-eye situation?
Replies
11
Views
2K
I Why do modern X ray images have better resolution compared to older ones?
Replies
6
Views
2K
B Does light ever go from the eye to the image?
Replies
17
Views
3K
Fluoroscopic optimal conditions
Replies
4
Views
998

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top