Maximizing the Area of a Pentagon with Fixed Perimeter

In summary, the homework statement is trying to find the length of the sides of a pentagon that maximize the area of the pentagon.
  • #1
joemama69
399
0

Homework Statement



a pentagon is formed by placing an isosceles triangle on a rectangle. If the pentagon has a fixed perimeter P, determine the lengths of the sides of the pentagon that maximize the area of the pentagon

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



not sure where to start since it is a irregular pentagon
 

Attachments

  • 12.pdf
    9.3 KB · Views: 472
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
joemama69 said:
a pentagon is formed by placing an isosceles triangle on a rectangle. If the pentagon has a fixed perimeter P, determine the lengths of the sides of the pentagon that maximize the area of the pentagon

not sure where to start since it is a irregular pentagon

What's the difficulty? :confused:

Call the lengths of the sides a b and c, then add the area of the rectangle to that of the triangle, and maximise. :smile:
 
  • #3
tiny-tim said:
What's the difficulty? :confused:

Call the lengths of the sides a b and c, then add the area of the rectangle to that of the triangle, and maximise. :smile:

I think there is a problem. Cause we are dealing with three variables but we have just two equtions 1) 2a + 2b + c =P and 2) The one which tells about the total area. By normal convention we diff equation number 2. But we have three variables out of which we are able to eliminate just one.

Or else we could convert the equation number 2) in a quadratic of b. I am not totally sure whether that works or not
 
  • #4
FedEx said:
I think there is a problem. Cause we are dealing with three variables but we have just two equtions 1) 2a + 2b + c =P and 2) The one which tells about the total area. By normal convention we diff equation number 2. But we have three variables out of which we are able to eliminate just one.

Or else we could convert the equation number 2) in a quadratic of b. I am not totally sure whether that works or not

Why do you think there is a problem? The perimeter constraint eliminates one variable. Now you have an equation for the area in terms of two variables. You 'diff' equation 2 with respect to each one of the two remaining variables and set them equal to zero. That's two equations in two unknowns. Where is problem?
 
  • #5
Dick said:
Why do you think there is a problem? The perimeter constraint eliminates one variable. Now you have an equation for the area in terms of two variables. You 'diff' equation 2 with respect to each one of the two remaining variables and set them equal to zero. That's two equations in two unknowns. Where is problem?

Are you telling me to differentiate it partially?

Well course.

Well the thing is that we haven't been taught with partial differentiation. Theres not much to it in undergraduate math... but still it does make a diff if you have learned it formally
 
  • #6
heres what i got so far

A(1) = ab
A(2) = .5a[tex]\sqrt{c^2 - (a/2)^2}[/tex]

Total A = A(1) + A(2) = ab + .5a[tex]\sqrt{c^2 - (a/2)^2}[/tex]

P = a + 2b + 2c

"Why do you think there is a problem? The perimeter constraint eliminates one variable."

by that do mean solving for let's say a = P - 2b - 2c
and then i would plug it into the other equation

A = (P - 2b - 2c)b + .5(P - 2b - 2c) [tex]\sqrt{c^2 - (P - 2b - 2c) /2^2}[/tex]

"Now you have an equation for the area in terms of two variables"

seems like there's three to me, P,b,c

"You 'diff' equation 2 with respect to each one of the two remaining variables and set them equal to zero."

which variables do i differentiate in terms of
 
  • #7
P isn't a variable. It's 'fixed'. Your final answers for a, b and c will need to be given in terms of P.
 
  • #8
Dick said:
P isn't a variable. It's 'fixed'. Your final answers for a, b and c will need to be given in terms of P.

Precisely. So diff P w.r.t to any variable would give you zero
 
  • #9
ok

A = Pb - 2b2 - 2bc + (P/2 - b - c)(2c2 - P2/4 + Pc + Pb + b2 + 2bc)1/2

Ab = P - 4b + 2c + 1/2(p/2 - b - c)(P + 2b + 2c)(2c2 - p2/4 + Pc + Pb + b2 + 2bc)-1/2 - (2c2 - p2/4 + Pc + Pb + b2 + 2bc)1/2

Ab = P - 4b + 2c + (P2/8 - b2 - 2c2 - 3bc - Pc/2)/(2c2 - P2/4 + Pc + Pb + b2 + 2bc)1/2 - (2c2 - P2/4 + Pc + Pb + b2 + 2bc)1/2

So that is the Partial of A with respect to b. Based on what u told me i will also have to differentiate A with respect to c. I should set them both equal to 0, find all critical points, and then figure out which one is the maximum.

Have i done it right so far. Its quite messy, is there an easier way or do i just have to deal w/ it
 
  • #10
I think it's somewhat messy however you do it. But doing it that way I definitely would have eliminated b instead of a. The easiest way is probably to put P in as a Lagrange multiplier, if you've learned that.
 
  • #11
Nope we never learned that. this is pretty messy, if you think its work it do u mind walkin me through it

BTW, i solved bor b instead, much simpler

A'(a,c) = P/2 - 2a - c + (2ac - a^2/2)/(4[tex]\sqrt{c^2 - a^2/4}[/tex]) + [tex]\sqrt{c^2 -a^2/4}[/tex]/2
 
  • #12
joemama69 said:
Nope we never learned that. this is pretty messy, if you think its work it do u mind walkin me through it

BTW, i solved bor b instead, much simpler

A'(a,c) = P/2 - 2a - c + (2ac - a^2/2)/(4[tex]\sqrt{c^2 - a^2/4}[/tex]) + [tex]\sqrt{c^2 -a^2/4}[/tex]/2

I would start with the d/dc equation rather than the d/da. It's MUCH simpler. It's pretty easy to find the relation between a and c and eliminate another variable in d/da.
 
  • #13
I assume that means the partial of A with respect to c

Ac = -a + ac / (2[tex]\sqrt{c^2 - a^2/4}[/tex]) = 0

a = ac / (2[tex]\sqrt{c^2 - a^2/4}[/tex]) Square both sides to solve for a

a2 = a2c2 / (4c2 - a2)

4a2c2 - a4 = a2c2

a2 = 4c2 - c2 therefore a = c[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]

0 = -c[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex] + (c2[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]) / (2(c2 - 3c2/4)1/2)

0 = -c[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex] + (c2[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]) / 2(c2/4)1/2

0 = -c[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex] + (c2[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]) / c

0 = -c[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex] + c[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]

something aint right. where i go wrong
 
  • #14
I'll agree with a=sqrt(3)*c. Beyond that I think you should learn to check you own work. Would you try it again and if it doesn't work post clearly what you got for dA/da. I agree with parts of what you got, but I didn't get the same form for the whole thing. I think you are capable of finishing this on your own. That's a compliment.
 
  • #15
Yup got the same thing

Ok so

Ac = -a + (ac)/(2[tex]\sqrt{c^2 - (a^2)/4}[/tex]) = 0, a = [tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]c

0 = -[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]c + ([tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]c2)/(2[tex]\sqrt{c^2 - (3c^2)/4}[/tex] )

0 = -[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]c + ([tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]c2)/(2[tex]\sqrt{(c^2)/4[/tex])

0 = -[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]c + ([tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]c2)/((2c)/2)

0 = -[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]c + ([tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]c2)/c

0 = -[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]c + ([tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]c


Did i plug my a into the wrong equation
 
  • #16
It looks to me like you are plugging a=sqrt(3)*c back into the same equation you used to derive that relation. Plug it into dA/da, not dA/dc.
 
  • #17
that thought crossed my head

ok so ..

Aa = P/2 - a - c - a2/(8[tex]\sqrt{c^2 - (a^2)/4}[/tex]) + ([tex]\sqrt{c^2 - (a^2)/4}[/tex])/2 = 0, plug in a = [tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]c

0 = P/2 - [tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]c - c - 3c2/(8[tex]\sqrt{c^2 - (3c^2)/4}[/tex]) + ([tex]\sqrt{c^2 - (3c^2)/4}[/tex])/2

0 = P/2 - [tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]c - c - 3c2/(4c) + c/4

0 = P/2 - [tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]c - c - 3c/4 + c/4

P = c(2[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex] + 7/2)

c = P/(2[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex] + 7/2)
 
  • #18
Fine, except you made an arithmetic error. In problems like these you can have several choices of variables to eliminate, and several choices of which equation and variable to solve for first. Try and look ahead and figure out which choice will make your life easier.
 
  • #19
Where is my error @, i can't find it
 
  • #20
joemama69 said:
Where is my error @, i can't find it

Between the third line from the end and the next one.
 
  • #21
ok found it

so c = P/(2[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]+3/2)

and a = [tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]c = [tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]P/(2[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]+3/2)

what do i do from here, I am lost
 
  • #22
joemama69 said:
ok found it

so c = P/(2[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]+3/2)

and a = [tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]c = [tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]P/(2[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]+3/2)

what do i do from here, I am lost

Uh, maybe find b? That 3/2 still isn't right.
 
  • #23
sorry stupid question

P = a + 2b + 2c

P = [tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]P/(2[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex] + 3/2) + 2b + 2P/(2[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex] + 3/2)

2b = P - [tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]P/(2[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex] + 3/2) - 2P/(2[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex] + 3/2)

b = P/2[1 - ([tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]-2)/(2[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex] + 3/2)]
 
  • #24
0 = P/2 - [tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]c - c - (3c/4) + c/4 move everything over except the p

P/2 = [tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex]c + c + (3c/4) - c/4

P/2 = c([tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex] + 1 + (3/4) - 1/4)

P/2 = c([tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex] + 1 + (3/4) - 1/4

P/2 = c([tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex] + 3/2)

c = P/(2(([tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex] + 3/2)


c = P/(2[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex] + 3) gotcha

that makes b = (P/2)/[1 - ([tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex] -2)/(2[tex]\sqrt{3}[/tex] + 3)]
 

1. What is the formula for calculating the maximum area of a pentagon with a fixed perimeter?

The formula for calculating the maximum area of a pentagon with a fixed perimeter is given by: A = (P^2 / 25) * (sqrt(5 * (5 + 2 * sqrt(5)))), where A is the maximum area and P is the fixed perimeter.

2. How do you prove that this formula gives the maximum area for a pentagon with a fixed perimeter?

This formula is derived from the isoperimetric inequality, which states that among all polygons with the same perimeter, the regular polygon has the largest area. Since a regular pentagon has the largest area among all pentagons with the same perimeter, this formula gives the maximum area.

3. Can this formula be used for all types of pentagons?

No, this formula only applies to regular pentagons. For other types of pentagons, different methods must be used to calculate the maximum area.

4. What is the relationship between the perimeter and area of a pentagon when the area is maximized?

As the perimeter increases, the area of a pentagon with fixed perimeter also increases. However, the rate of increase decreases as the perimeter gets larger. This means that as the perimeter approaches infinity, the area approaches a limit, which is given by the formula mentioned above.

5. Are there any real-world applications of this concept?

Yes, the concept of maximizing the area of a polygon with a fixed perimeter has many real-world applications. For example, it can be used in architecture and construction to maximize the usable space within a given perimeter. It can also be applied in fields such as urban planning, landscaping, and agriculture.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
863
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
30
Views
3K
Back
Top