MHB Maximizing Area of Inscribed Rectangle - Yahoo Answers

MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here is the question:

Optimization, Maximum area...?

A rectangle has one side on the x-axis and two vertices on the curve

y=7/(1+x^2)

Find the vertices of the rectangle with maximum area.

I have posted a link there to this thread so the OP can view my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Sunshine,

Because of the even symmetry of the given curve, the base $b$ of the rectangle will be $b=2x$ and the height $h$ will be $y$. And so the area of the rectangle is:

$$A=2xy$$ where $0\le x$

Substituting for $y$, we then get the area as a function of $x$:

$$A(x)=2x\left(\frac{7}{x^2+1} \right)=\frac{14x}{x^2+1}$$

Now, we want to find the critical value(s), so we equate the derivative with respect to $x$ to zero:

$$A'(x)=\frac{\left(x^2+1 \right)(14)-(14x)(2x)}{\left(x^2+1 \right)^2}=\frac{14\left(1-x^2 \right)}{\left(x^2+1 \right)^2}=0$$

And so we see that our relevant critical value is:

$$x=1$$

Using the first derivative test, we can see that on $(0,1)$ the area function is increasing and on $(1,\infty)$ the area function is decreasing, so we know our critical value is at a maximum. Hence the vertices of the rectangle of maximal area are:

$$\left(-1,0 \right),\,\left(-1,\frac{7}{2} \right),\,\left(1,0 \right),\,\left(1,\frac{7}{2} \right)$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top