Maximizing Battery Voltage in a Complex Combination Circuit

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the maximum electromotive force (emf) that a battery can have in a complex combination circuit without exceeding the power ratings of the resistors. Participants explore the equivalent resistance of the circuit and the implications for current and power dissipation across various resistors.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes their method for calculating equivalent resistance, treating certain resistors as parallel and others as series, but expresses uncertainty about their approach.
  • Another participant agrees with the initial approach but suggests that further verification is needed.
  • A participant questions whether the initial answer was correct, indicating a shared struggle with the problem.
  • It is noted that the power rating of a resistor combination depends on the configuration, with emphasis on identifying the resistor that will dissipate the most power (I²R product).
  • One participant calculates the equivalent resistance of a specific configuration and discusses the implications for current and power dissipation, suggesting a method to find the maximum emf.
  • Another participant challenges the assumption that the highest resistance will necessarily dissipate the most power, pointing out the effect of current division in parallel resistors.
  • A later reply clarifies that the power dissipated by resistors in parallel is affected by the division of current, leading to a lower I²R product than expected.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct approach to identifying the resistor that will reach its power limit first. There is no consensus on which resistor will dissipate the most power, and multiple competing views remain regarding the calculations and methods used.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of the circuit and the need to consider both resistance values and current distribution when calculating power dissipation. The discussion reveals potential limitations in the assumptions made about resistor configurations and their impact on power ratings.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and enthusiasts working on circuit analysis, particularly those interested in power dissipation in resistor networks and the implications of different configurations on overall circuit behavior.

john2013
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The problems says "In the circuit shown in the figure all the resistors are rated at a maximum power of 1.20W"
Then it asks "What is the maximum emf that the battery can have without burning up any of the resistors?"

Really, The only part I think I'm having trouble with is finding what the resistance is when they are all put together, because I treat the top right part as if the two 20s are in parallel with each other, then that is in series with the 10 Ohm resistor, so I add that. Then the 3 at the top right are parallel, so I add them accordingly (with the 1/r thing)...and I think that is where my problem lies. Especially when I add the 20 ohms as if they are in parallel.

Here is the picture:

http://session.masteringphysics.com/problemAsset/1054826/4/YF-26-68.jpg


I think the Voltage I keep getting is 11.4 or so.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your approach sounds correct to me, but second opinion won't hurt.
 
So dude, was your answer right? I'm sort of in the same predicament as you right now lols
 
You can find the equivalent resistance using your stated approach. This is the first step. It allows you to define the source current in terms of E and Req. The problem is--now what do you do? You cannot simply apply the power rating of 1.2W to Req because the power rating of a resistor combination depends on the combination. For example, if you had N resistors in parallel, the power rating of this Req would be N*1.2W.

What you are looking for is the weakest link[the hottest link, actually]-- the resistor with the highest I2R product.
 
The two 20's in parallel amount to a 10. And that 10 is in series with another 10, making it 20. So in the top right corner there are 3 parallel branches: that 20 I just described in parallel with 15 in parallel with 25. The rest of the circuit you can add up in your head because they are in series.

Once you have the total loop resistance, you can work out an equation for the current drawn from the source, E volts.

Then, as lewando stated, you need to look for a resistor with a high resistance AND carrying a high current, so it has the highest I2R product.
 
Last edited:
There is not much working involved. They could have made the question a lot trickier by swapping two of the resistor values around, but they have settled on an easy arrangement.
 
The Hightest I2R would be the resistor with 50[itex]\Omega[/itex] right? I got an equivalent resistance of the whole circuit of 5940/47=126.38[itex]\Omega[/itex]. I found the current in which the power of highest resistance would be less than 1.2W. So,
I2R<1.2
I<[itex]\sqrt{}1.2/50[/itex]=0.155A
Then I found the [itex]\epsilon[/itex] using [itex]\epsilon[/itex]=IR=0.155x126.28=19.57V

Is that right :$
 
shikobe said:
The Hightest I2R would be the resistor with 50[itex]\Omega[/itex] right?

I don't think so. This is the highest resistance, but only half the current.
 
There isn't a resistor of 50 ohms. There are two resistors of 50 ohms and they are in parallel, which means the current divides and only half goes through each. (And because power = I2R when the current is halved, the power dissipated is one-quarter what it could otherwise be.)

So simply looking for the highest value resistor is not good enough. You have to calculate the I2R product for likely candidates before you can identify which resistor will get hottest.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
13K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K