Maximizing Entropy vs Minimizing Gibbs Function - Why?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Thermodave
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Entropy Gibbs
AI Thread Summary
Maximizing the total entropy of a system and its reservoir can be equivalent to minimizing the Gibbs energy of the system under specific conditions. It is incorrect to minimize the entropy of the system alone, as the constraints, such as constant pressure or temperature, influence the choice of energy potentials. Different potentials, including Helmholtz, Enthalpy, and Gibbs, are applicable based on the system's conditions. The discussion highlights that various thermodynamic potentials can be derived depending on the constraints, emphasizing the importance of understanding these relationships. Overall, the Second Law of Thermodynamics underpins the tendency for total entropy maximization.
Thermodave
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
It occurs to me that some people create codes to maximize the entropy of a system in order to predict equilibrium concentrations. However, others minimize the Gibbs function. I understand the relationship, so why the two methods? Aren't these results always the same? Is there a practical reason for this?
 
Science news on Phys.org
There is a difference in what these energy apply to.

Basically maximizing the total entropy of system+reservoir is (under special circumstances only!) equivalent to minimizing the Gibbs energy of the system alone.

It is incorrect to minimize the entropy of the system alone. Also the contraints (pressure or temperature kept constant?) matter for the decision whether to use Gibbs energy or one of the other three potentials (Helmholtz, Energy, Enthalpy).
 
Last edited:
Gerenuk said:
There is a difference in what these energy apply to.

Basically minimizing the total entropy of system+reservoir is (under special circumstances only!) equivalent to minimizing the Gibbs energy of the system alone.

It is incorrect to minimize the entropy of the system alone. Also the contraints (pressure or temperature kept constant?) matter for the decision whether to use Gibbs energy or one of the other three potentials (Helmholtz, Energy, Enthalpy).

Surely you mean maximize entropy?

We start with the differential expression for energy, dU=T\,dS-P\,dV+\sum_i \mu_i\,dN_i+\dots. For systems at constant entropy, volume, and mass (and all other extensive variables constant), we minimize the potential U (the internal energy).

We can rewrite the equation as -dS=-1/T\,dU-P/T\,dV+\sum_i \mu_i/T\,dN_i+\dots. So for systems at constant energy, volume, and mass, we maximize the potential S (the entropy).

We can always derive various different potentials for variations on the system. If the entropy, pressure, and mass are constant, for example, we use the Legendre transform H=U+PV to get dH=-T\,dS-V\,dP+\sum_i \mu_i\,dN_i. Thus, we minimize the enthalpy H for these systems.

If the temperature, pressure, and mass are constant (a frequent scenario), we minimize the Gibbs potential G=U+PV-TS. If the temperature, volume, and chemical potential of species i are constant, we minimize the potential \Lambda=U-TS-\mu_i N_i. And so on.

Callen's Thermodynamics has a nice discussion of this. It all comes from the tendency for total entropy to be maximized (i.e., Second Law).
 
I need to calculate the amount of water condensed from a DX cooling coil per hour given the size of the expansion coil (the total condensing surface area), the incoming air temperature, the amount of air flow from the fan, the BTU capacity of the compressor and the incoming air humidity. There are lots of condenser calculators around but they all need the air flow and incoming and outgoing humidity and then give a total volume of condensed water but I need more than that. The size of the...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top