Schools Maximizing Grad School Chances with Cosmology Focus

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges faced by a recent physics graduate aspiring to study cosmology. With a GPA of 3.5 and limited research experience primarily in optics and materials science, the individual expresses concern about their future prospects in cosmology and the competitive nature of graduate school applications. They plan to take the Physics Graduate Record Examination (PGRE) next fall to strengthen their application. Advice offered includes leveraging their current R&D experience to apply to graduate programs that integrate both practical fields and cosmology. It is suggested that they consider taking astrophysics courses during their undergraduate studies to bolster their knowledge and readiness for graduate-level work. The conversation emphasizes that graduate schools do not expect undergraduates to have a clear focus on their future research area and that diverse experiences can be beneficial. Overall, the importance of demonstrating motivation and adaptability in pursuing one's academic and career goals is highlighted.
ThereIam
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I think this is probably the only decent question I've come up with about how to handle my future.

I really, really want to study cosmology.

I am a recent graduate (graduated in May) with a BA in physics. My GPA is mediocre - 3.5 in the major and overall. I'm sort of banking on (stupid, I know) killing the PGRE to shine. Or at least not bombing it. I will take it next fall (I have already begun studying).

My only research experience is the work I do now - I work in R&D for a company where most of my work pertains to optics and materials science. I committed to be here until late summer of next year, and I will not break my word. I will be applying to schools in the next fall.

I am intimidated by the perception that there isn't actually a lot of work to be had for those interested in cosmology (not after my graduate degree - I accept that, and it doesn't change what I want to study - I mean work I could get right now). I wonder if I am hurting myself by not actively pursuing work closer to my goals before applying to graduate school. I want to demonstrate my interest, but I don't know how!

What am I to do??

Any advice is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


This seems a very unique situation, and I can only make a guess at an opinion (phrased as some questions even). But why not use your optics & mat sci experiences to get into a physics grad program that has both these "more practical" fields of study as well as the cosmology you want to learn for yourself? Would you be happy enough to learn cosmology at the graduate level, perhaps doing some independent studies (intro research) with some cosmology profs, while your dissertation was in your more practical field?

My program has a breadth requirement, and so a course in GR was one of my "breadths". I don't have a lot of free time in my research, but I do have enough time to take an "interest" course if I want. (At my school you are free to take any course offered at the university, but you need to check each school for this privilege. Some of our grads study French, others astronomy, optics, finance, whatever.)

In your practical field, you will most likely be on RA, and that would give you the advantage to study something else on the side (though that would make your PhD take longer). There is always a trade off, but maybe there is a way to have your cake and eat it too. You should check on the "rigidity" of the program before you apply, though.

I have always personally found it difficult to choose between the fields because they are all so "juicy", each in its own way. But no matter what, I would think you should take some astrophysics course(s) while you are an undergrad in order to be ready.

Anyway, just thinking out loud really. Good luck!
 


It's ok to have your research experience not be in the field you want to do. For the most part, it just goes to show that you are motivated to do work in the field, and that you aren't completely incompetent at actual science. A simple example is that most theorists have lab experience in undergrad, which doesn't say much about their actual ability to do their intended research. But more generally, grad schools don't expect you to know exactly what you want to do when you are an undergrad, so they can't expect you to get experience in that field. Besides, working in one field can convince you that a different field is what you actually want to do.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top