Maximizing Marine Power: Calculating Average Output of a 200km2 Tidal Barrage

  • Thread starter Thread starter thebest99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Marine Power
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the average power output of a tidal barrage with an area of 200 km², considering varying tidal ranges of 6m at spring tides and 2m at neap tides. Participants explore the theoretical and mathematical aspects of energy extraction from tidal movements.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant introduces the problem of calculating average power output based on tidal range and area.
  • Another suggests starting with tidal activity over a lunar cycle to inform calculations.
  • A participant presents a calculation using the potential energy formula, yielding a result of 745 GW, but does not clarify the units or reasoning behind the calculation.
  • Another participant expresses confusion over the differing results and questions the validity of the potential energy equation used.
  • Further calculations are presented, including a potential energy calculation that results in 64353.6 x 10^9 J, but the reasoning remains unclear.
  • A participant emphasizes the importance of using units in calculations and critiques the application of the potential energy formula, suggesting that the mass of water is distributed along the height rather than concentrated at a single height.
  • There is a request for clarification on the calculations and methods used, indicating a desire for collaborative problem-solving.
  • One participant challenges the clarity of the expressions used in calculations and encourages elaboration on the method of energy extraction from the ocean.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the calculations or the methods used. There are multiple competing views on the correct approach to calculating average power output, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the clarity of calculations presented, including missing units and assumptions about the distribution of mass in the potential energy formula. The discussion also highlights unresolved mathematical steps and varying interpretations of tidal energy extraction.

thebest99
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
A tidal barrage contains an area of of sea of 200km2 and the tidal range 6m at spring tides and 2m at neap tides.

What would be the average power output over the year?

Any help would be great,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can start by coming up with the tidal activity during a lunar cycle based on the definitions of spring and neap tides.
 
What I have worked out: ep=mgh

P2hgh/6x60x60

1025x2x2x9.81x2/ 6x60x60

=745gw
 
I get something significantly different. If you provide more detail in your reasoning and calculations (units), I could better understand how we have such different results. I can tell you that your equation for potential energy is suspect.
 
Firstly thanks for your help. I have 1025 as my mass. 9.81gravity. 4m difference in height. PE=mgh.

This is what we had I'm class:

1025x2x2x9.81/6x60x60

200x10 to the power of 6.

Slightly confused how they got this.

Please could you help work through
 
4x1025x200x10to the power6x 4x9.81x2
=64353.6x10 to the power 9 J
 
You need to start (and never stop) using units in your calculations. PE = mgh only applies if all the mass is at h. With a volume of water, mass is distributed along h [edit: from 0 to h]. "1025", by itself, is meaningless-- certainly not mass. 1025 kg/m3 is the density of seawater.
 
Last edited:
Could you show me how you work this out then please
 
Can't do that due to the forum's rules. You need to do the work. But anyway, let's work with what you have posted:
What I have worked out: ep=mgh
Potential energy for a column of water is not mgh. It is less than this. Water at the bottom of the container does not contribute as much as water at the top. But you are correct to look for the potential energy. Try to research this or at least think about it. After you have done that, you can look here to confirm:
PEwater_column = mgh/2
P2hgh/6x60x60
I was hoping you would say something like "to find average power, I need to find the energy collected over a specific interval and divide that energy by that time interval". Would you agree with that? If so, what specific interval are you considering (and why)? Anyway, it looks like you are trying to divide energy by time to get power (average power). But lack of units make that very unclear. I get that P is density of saltwater, but how do you get "P2hgh"? And what about "6x60x60"--why would you use 6? Again: use units.


1025x2x2x9.81x2/ 6x60x60

=745gw
Well I get 3.72 with no units, so please re-work this.


One final note: rather than banging out any more unitless expressions, why not take some time and elaborate on your method of extracting energy from the ocean. That way we can tell if your on the right track or not.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
6K