Maximizing Plug Flow Efficiency for CSTR Blending: Expert Tips & Strategies

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around formulating a plug flow model integrated with a series of Continuous Stirred Tank Reactors (CSTR) to achieve a specific residence time distribution. The user aims to utilize the plug flow to delay the output flow without altering the CSTR's shape. They are facing issues with mass conservation in their model, suspecting that boundary conditions or numerical analysis may be at fault. The user provides specific boundary conditions related to flow rates and mass but seeks further advice on resolving these issues. Overall, the focus is on effectively combining plug flow and CSTR models to meet the desired process requirements.
colen212
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am trying to formulate a plug flow for section of my model. In my model, I've series of CSTR that are linked with the plug flow. The output of the plug flow model is the CSTR model. My main focus is blending CSTR and plug to replicate a residenc time distribution. However, i need a plug flow at the beginning so as to delay the process and not alter the shape of the CTSR.

Can anyone advice me on the best way to go about this?
Any advice will be appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Colen
Could you give a little more detail of what you're trying to do exactly. What do you mean by 'the output of the plug flow model is the CSTR model', do you mean that this is physically the case, i.e. you have a PFR connected to a CSTR, or do you only use the PFR to 'model' a time delay of your input signal?

The basic equation for an RTD-model in a PFR is the transient convection model (in 1D):
\frac{\partial C}{\partial t}=u\frac{\partial C}{\partial x}

By the way, I'm guessing you're a chemical engineer (like I am), on a forum like this it might be smart to explain what a CSTR is, I'm not sure whether that is common knowledge outside the chemical engineering community.

Regards,

Michiel
 
Thanks for your reply. I just assumed. sorry about abt. Please note CSTR is continuous stirred tank reactor.
You got the problem description. I am trying to use the plug flow as a delay signal. I want to delay the flow out of the system so I had to use the plug flow. I've used the equation you posted but the mass is not conserved. As expected, my input flowrate should be the same value of output flow. I suspected my boundary conditons or the numerical analysis are the issues:
Here are boundary conditions that I used:

m(0) = Flowrate_in/u
u*(Partial(m(L)) = u *m(L)

where u is the velocity which is L/t, and L is the length and t = time
m is the mass(kg)
m(0) is the mass at the inlet
m(L) is the mass at the outlet.

Please I'll appreciate any advice that will be useful.
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top