Maximizing Rocket Height at 1km Altitude: Solving for Acceleration and Time

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum height of a rocket that accelerates at 12 m/s² and shuts off its motor at 1 km altitude. The user initially calculates the final velocity at 1 km and then uses it to find the time of ascent and the maximum height, arriving at approximately 2214.82 meters. Concerns are raised about whether the acceleration accounts for gravitational forces acting on the rocket during its ascent. It is clarified that the acceleration provided includes the effects of gravity and that air resistance is often neglected in such calculations. The user seeks confirmation on their approach and understanding of the problem.
fisselt
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
I know I've done this problem a few times before but I'm just a fumbling idiot at the moment..

Homework Statement


Rocket has an acceleration of 12m/s^2 and at an altitude of 1km the motor shuts off. What is the maximum height?


Homework Equations


V^2=V_i+2a(x_f-X_i)
x_f=x_i+V_i(t)+1/2at^2

The Attempt at a Solution


V^2=0+2(12)(1000)=154.92m/s
0=154.92t-9.8t^2, t=17.213s
x_f=1000+154.95(17.213)-1/2(9.8)(17.213)^2=2214.82meters


I feel like I'm doing it wrong. 12m/s^2 is the acceleration of the motor, shouldn't their be some force from gravity on the rocket while going towards 1000m?

Thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fisselt said:
I know I've done this problem a few times before but I'm just a fumbling idiot at the moment..

Homework Statement


Rocket has an acceleration of 12m/s^2 and at an altitude of 1km the motor shuts off. What is the maximum height?


Homework Equations


V^2=V_i+2a(x_f-X_i)
x_f=x_i+V_i(t)+1/2at^2

The Attempt at a Solution


V^2=0+2(12)(1000)=154.92m/s
0=154.92t-9.8t^2, t=17.213s
x_f=1000+154.95(17.213)-1/2(9.8)(17.213)^2=2214.82meters


I feel like I'm doing it wrong. 12m/s^2 is the acceleration of the motor, shouldn't their be some force from gravity on the rocket while going towards 1000m?

Thanks for the help.

The acceleration of the motor/rocket combination is the change noticed under the combined influence of the force of gravity, and the thrust force of the rocket motor, and presumably any frictional forces from the air. You are probably supposed to ignore the air resistance - a common approximation used with this sort of problem.
 
thanks for the help
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top