Maximizing Voltage from a Wet Cell Battery

AI Thread Summary
A wet cell battery operates through electrochemical reactions involving liquid electrolytes. To maximize voltage from a single cell, one must utilize half-reactions with the highest standard reduction potentials, as indicated in the standard reduction potentials table. The optimal combination identified includes lithium and fluorine, yielding a maximum voltage of 5.91 volts. Factors such as temperature can affect the battery's performance, with high heat potentially leading to evaporation or chemical accumulation. Understanding these principles can enhance the efficiency of wet cell batteries.
yjk91
Messages
73
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Describe a wet cell battery and explain its operation?
How would would ensure getting maximum voltage. Assume you are only permitted a single cell.

The Attempt at a Solution


I got the first question, but i don't get how to answer the second question. i know that when a wet cell battery is in a hot climate, the water in a battery will evaporate or accumulate the chemical inside. other than this i have no idea how to answer this question. Also i think using chemical that have large potention Energy.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well if single cell means only one wet cell, then i think i can answer it.

you have to use the standard reduction potentials table to find the half reactions that will react to form the most voltage.

using the table, i get:

(1st half reaction) F2(g) + 2e- \rightleftharpoons 2F- Eo = 2.87Volts

(2nd half reaction) Li(s) \rightleftharpoons Li+ + e- Eo = 3.04 volts

(Cell Redox reaction) 2Li+ + F2(g) \rightleftharpoons 2F- + 2Li(s) Eo = 5.91 volts.

This is the highest voltage possible with a wet cell i think...well hope i helped.
 
Last edited:
thanks i understand it now
 
kk glad to help
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top