Maximum Capillary Rise: Dynamic Treatment of Liquid in Motion?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the formula for capillary rise, which is influenced by surface tension and the geometry of the surrounding reservoir. The maximum height is derived from the equation 2σ/(ρgr) when cos(θ)=1, applicable in cases with an infinite reservoir. However, participants question how a narrower surrounding might affect this height. A dynamic treatment of the liquid in motion is suggested as necessary for a more accurate analysis. Clarifications on the phrasing of the problem statement are also noted as potentially impacting the interpretation of the answer.
Rituraj131
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A capillay tube is just in contact with a liquid surface of perfectly wetting liquid. What is the maximum height liquid can rise inside the capilary?
Relevant Equations
H=2σcos(θ)/(ρgr)
I know that the height in general is goven by 2σcos(θ)/(ρgr). So the maximum height can be 2σ/(ρgr) with cos(θ)=1. But the answer given is c.
 

Attachments

  • 20190403_012240.jpg
    20190403_012240.jpg
    50.4 KB · Views: 341
Physics news on Phys.org
Rituraj131 said:
I know that the height in general is goven by 2σcos(θ)/(ρgr).
That is for the case where the surrounding reservoir is effectively infinite in area. How do you think it might be affected by a narrower surround?
(But I am not sure this gets to answer c.)
 
haruspex said:
That is for the case where the surrounding reservoir is effectively infinite in area. How do you think it might be affected by a narrower surround?
(But I am not sure this gets to answer c.)
Thank you for you response. Actually the problem needs a dynamic treatment of the liquid in motion
 
Rituraj131 said:
Thank you for you response. Actually the problem needs a dynamic treatment of the liquid in motion
Ah, ok... you unintentionally altered the statement by writing "is just in contact" instead of "is put in contact".

Does this mean you now get the intended answer?
 
  • Like
Likes Rituraj131
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top