Maximum of dependent exponential random variables

chased
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Pdf (or mgf) of maximum of dependent exponential random variables ?

max of Z1, Z2, Z3, Z4

where

Z1 = |X1+X2+X3|^2 + |Y1+Y2+Y3|^2
Z2 = |X1-X2+X3|^2 + |Y1-Y2+Y3|^2
Z3 = |X1+X2-X3|^2 + |Y1+Y2-Y3|^2
Z4 = |X1-X2-X3|^2 + |Y1-Y2-Y3|^2

Xi, Yi are independent zero mean normal with variance 1/2.

So, Z1,Z2,Z3,Z4 are indentically distributed exponential random variables,
But they are correlated.

Can anybody help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry are the Xis and Yis independent of each other or are they all independent of everything else?

If they are all independent of each other then you have a Chi square as the sums of normals are a normal, and square of a normal is chi-squared and sums of chi-squares are chi-squared.

Hope that's helpful
 
Thank you. Xis and Yis are all independent of each other.
Yes. I have 4 Chi-square RVs. They are dependent.
Can I find the pdf of the maximum of those?
 
Here is a symbolic description of the solution to the problem, hope it makes
any sense:You want to calculate the PDF of a variable Z_{\max } = \max \left( {Z_1<br /> ,Z_2 ,Z_3 ,Z_4 } \right) where
<br /> \begin{array}{l}<br /> Z_1 = f_1 ({\rm {\bf X,Y}}) = \left| {X_1 + X_2 + X_3 } \right|^2 + \left|<br /> {Y_1 + Y_2 + Y_3 } \right|^2 \\<br /> Z_2 = f_2 ({\rm {\bf X,Y}}) = \left| {X_1 - X_2 + X_3 } \right|^2 + \left|<br /> {Y_1 - Y_2 + Y_3 } \right|^2 \\<br /> Z_3 = f_3 ({\rm {\bf X,Y}}) = \left| {X_1 + X_2 - X_3 } \right|^2 + \left|<br /> {Y_1 + Y_2 - Y_3 } \right|^2 \\<br /> Z_4 = f_4 ({\rm {\bf X,Y}}) = \left| {X_1 - X_2 - X_3 } \right|^2 + \left|<br /> {Y_1 - Y_2 - Y_3 } \right|^2 \\<br /> \end{array}<br />You can write a symbolic solution to the PDF of any function Z=f(X) of a stochastic variable X as
<br /> p(z) = \int {p({ {x}})\delta \left( {z - f \left(<br /> {x} \right)} \right)d{ {x}}} <br />
where \delta(z) is Dirac's delta function.

Thus, the PDF of Z_{\max } = \max \left(<br /> {Z_1 ,Z_2 ,Z_3 ,Z_4 } \right) can be written as


<br /> p(z_{\max } ) = \int {p({\rm {\bf z}})\delta \left( {z_{\max } - \max \left(<br /> {z_1 ,z_2 ,z_3 ,z_4 } \right)} \right)d{\rm {\bf z}}} \qquad , \qquad (1)<br />
where
<br /> p({\rm {\bf z}}) = \int {\int {p({\rm {\bf x}},{\rm {\bf y}})\prod\limits_{k<br /> = 1}^4 {\delta \left( {z_k - f_k ({\rm {\bf x}},{\rm {\bf y}})} \right)}<br /> d{\rm {\bf x}}} d{\rm {\bf y}}} <br />

<br /> p({\rm {\bf x}},{\rm {\bf y}}) = p(x_1 )p(x_2 )p(x_3 )p(y_1 )p(y_2 )p(y_3 )<br />

and integration with respect to a vector
\int { \cdot d{\rm {\bf x}}}
stands for integration over all components:
\int\limits_{ - \infty }^\infty<br /> {\int\limits_{ - \infty }^\infty {\int\limits_{ - \infty }^\infty { \cdot<br /> dx_1 dx_2 dx_3 } } }

If you had already calculated p({\rm {\bf z}}), the integral in (1) can be
calculated by dividing the four-dimensional space of {\rm {\bf z}} into
four parts, over each of which \max \left( {z_1 ,z_2 ,z_3 ,z_4 } \right)
is linear. The integral them becomes a sum of four parts, albeit with
slightly complicated bounds.

The resulting expression is likely to be quite messy, I'd recommend using an
analytic math program (e.g. Matematica or Maple) to compute it.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top