Maximum principle for Delta u >0

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the maximum principle for functions u in C²(U) ∩ C(Ū) that satisfy Δu(x) > 0 for any x in U. It is established that such a function cannot achieve its maximum within the open set U. The Taylor expansion formula is utilized to demonstrate this, particularly through the application of the mean value theorem and vector calculus. Key equations include the conditions Du(x₀) = 0 and the negative definiteness of the Hessian matrix, which leads to a contradiction with the assumption that Δu ≥ 0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of C² functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with Taylor expansion and its applications
  • Knowledge of vector calculus, particularly gradients and Hessians
  • Concept of positive definiteness in matrix theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the maximum principle in partial differential equations
  • Learn about Taylor's theorem and its applications in multivariable calculus
  • Explore the properties of Hessian matrices and their role in optimization
  • Investigate the mean value theorem and its applications in mathematical analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in analysis and differential equations, as well as students studying advanced calculus and optimization techniques.

loesung
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello!

I would like to show the following: [tex]u\in C^2(U) \cap C(\bar{U})[/tex] satisfies [tex]\Delta u(x)>0[/tex] for any [tex]x\in U[/tex], then [tex]\max_U u[/tex] cannot be achieved by any point in [tex]U[/tex]. Here, [tex]u\in \mathbb{R}^n[/tex], i.e. it's not complex valued.

Apparently, one can use the Taylor expansion formula to show this. But how?

Thanks in advance!

Los
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
loesung said:
Apparently, one can use the Taylor expansion formula to show this. But how?
Los

Yes. Expand upto the first order , assume the contrary & apply the mean value theorem.
 
I was given the following explanation, though I really don't understand what's going on with eqs. (3) and (4):

Using Taylors theorem, write

[tex]u(x)=u(x_0)+\nabla u(x_0)\cdot(x-x_0)+\frac{1}{2}(x-x_0)^T\nabla^2 u(x^*)(x-x_0)[/tex]

Because we suppose a max is obtained, we have from vector calculus that

[tex]Du(x_0)=0, \qquad (1)[/tex]

[tex]\nabla^2 u (x_0)\leq 0 \mbox{ as a matrix}, \qquad (2)[/tex]

However, somehow it's important to note, for reasons that to me are not clear, that [tex]u[/tex] is positive definite...:


[tex]v^T\nabla^2u(x_0)v\leq 0 \mbox{ for all }v\in\mathbb{R}^n,\qquad (3)[/tex]

and so [tex]u(x_0)= \text{tr}(D^2u(x_0))\leq 0, \qquad (4)[/tex]

which contradicts the assumption that [tex]\Delta u\geq 0[/tex]

In particular I don't understand where [tex](1)[/tex] and [tex](2)[/tex] come from, and supposedly [tex](2)\Rightarrow (3)[/tex]...? I would appreciate if this could be cleared up!

Thank you for your time,



Los
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K