Maximum speed of anything, temperature

Learnphysics
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
If temperature or heat, is particles vibrating, and nothing moves faster then light. Doesn't this create a fundamental limit to the temperature that can be reached?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Temperature depends on the kinetic energy of the vibrating atoms, not their speed. Speed has an upper limit of c, but kinetic energy has no upper limit (at least in SR):

K = \frac {m_0 c^2} { \sqrt {1 - v^2 / c^2}} - m_0 c^2
 
Learnphysics said:
If temperature or heat, is particles vibrating, and nothing moves faster then light. Doesn't this create a fundamental limit to the temperature that can be reached?

Classically temperature is proportional to the thermal kinetic energy. The formula for relativistic kinetic energy goes to infinity as the particle velocity aproaches the speed of light. This limits the maximum temperature of a system to the temperature achieved if an infinite amount of energy is added, which effectively puts the temperature limit at infinity too.

On a more practical level, atoms can not remain atoms above certain temperatures as they are smashed by highly energetic collisions. Some say the highest know temperature was the temperature of the universe one Planck interval after the big bang and that is equivalent to the Planck temperature ( about 10^{32} kelvin ). Some other opinions can be found here : http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/zero/hot.html
 
Last edited:
Isn't the Planck temperature around 10^32?
 
Snazzy said:
Isn't the Planck temperature around 10^32?

Yes. Sorry. Corrected the typo ;)
 
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top