Maximum Temporal Distance Between Events That Are Simultaneous in Another Frame

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the claim that non-simultaneity of events in different reference frames could enable prognosticatory dreams. It is asserted that this idea misinterprets the Relativity of Simultaneity, which cannot be used to predict the future. The maximum temporal distance between simultaneous events is not fixed and varies based on relative velocity and observer perspective. Additionally, the assumption that time is linear and predictable is debated, lacking concrete evidence for future predictions. Ultimately, the concept of using non-simultaneity for such purposes is deemed unfounded and requires a critical scientific approach.
loseyourname
Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
Messages
1,829
Reaction score
5
There is a guy in the metaphysics forum that is claiming that the non-simultaneity of two events that are simultaneous in another reference frame allows for the possibility of prognosticatory dreams. I'd like to know the maximum distance you would be able to see into the future using this technique and how fast you would need to be moving. Can anyone tell me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
He doesn't know what he's talking about. There is no way that the Relativity of Simultaneity can be used to predict the future.
 


While the concept of non-simultaneity of events in different reference frames is a well-established concept in physics, using it to justify the possibility of prognosticatory dreams is a stretch. The maximum temporal distance between events that are simultaneous in another frame is not a fixed value that can be used to predict the future. It depends on various factors such as the relative velocity between the two frames, the spatial distance between the events, and the observer's perspective.

Moreover, the idea of using non-simultaneity to predict the future assumes that time is a linear and predictable concept, which is not necessarily true. The concept of time is still a subject of debate and there is no concrete evidence to support the idea of being able to see into the future using this technique.

In addition, the speed at which an observer would need to move to achieve this supposed ability is also not a straightforward answer. It would depend on the specific scenario and the relative velocities involved.

In conclusion, while the concept of non-simultaneity in different reference frames is an interesting concept in physics, it cannot be used to justify the possibility of prognosticatory dreams. The maximum temporal distance between events that are simultaneous in another frame is not a reliable measure for predicting the future and the speed at which one would need to move to achieve this ability is not a simple answer. It is important to approach such claims with a critical and scientific mindset.
 
MOVING CLOCKS In this section, we show that clocks moving at high speeds run slowly. We construct a clock, called a light clock, using a stick of proper lenght ##L_0##, and two mirrors. The two mirrors face each other, and a pulse of light bounces back and forth betweem them. Each time the light pulse strikes one of the mirrors, say the lower mirror, the clock is said to tick. Between successive ticks the light pulse travels a distance ##2L_0## in the proper reference of frame of the clock...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 144 ·
5
Replies
144
Views
11K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
47
Views
7K