Simultaneity between events in reference frames

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of simultaneity between events in different reference frames, specifically addressing how events perceived as simultaneous in one frame (S') are not simultaneous in another frame (S) moving with velocity v relative to S'. The key equations derived include the time difference observed in S, represented as Δt = Dv/(c² - v²), and the transformation of time intervals using the Lorentz transformation. The confusion arises from the interpretation of these equations, particularly when comparing readings from synchronized clocks in different frames. The participant concludes that they have gained a clearer understanding of simultaneity and the implications of relative motion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of special relativity concepts
  • Familiarity with Lorentz transformations
  • Knowledge of proper time and length contraction
  • Basic grasp of velocity and the speed of light (c)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Lorentz transformations in different reference frames
  • Explore the concept of time dilation and its mathematical representation
  • Learn about the implications of simultaneity in relativistic physics
  • Investigate practical applications of special relativity in modern physics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching special relativity, and anyone interested in understanding the nuances of simultaneity and reference frames in the context of relativistic motion.

PeroK
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
29,618
Reaction score
21,432
Hi,

I've been trying to understand the (lack of) simultaneity between events in reference frames moving wrt each other. I'd be grateful if someone could confirm that I've got things right:

If two events are simultaneous in one reference frame (S'), then they will not be simultaneous in a reference frame (S) moving with velocity v relative to S' if the events are separated by any distance (D' or D) in the direction of motion. In which case, an observer in S will observe a time difference of:

[itex]\Delta t = \frac{Dv}{(c^2 - v^2)} (*)[/itex]

And, if two events are separated by distance D' and time t' in S', then, as observed in S, they are separated by time:

[itex]\Delta t = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}(t' \pm \frac{D'v}{c^2})[/itex]

(*) The book I'm reading expressed this equation in terms of an observer in S reading the times off clocks synchronised in S' and getting:

[itex]\Delta t = \frac{D'v}{c^2}[/itex]

Which seems to me an odd way to express things and I think this confused me somewhat. Hopefully, I've now understood this simultaneity issue?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PeroK said:
... And, if two events are separated by distance D' and time t' in S', then, as observed in S, they are separated by time:

[itex]\Delta t = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}(t' \pm \frac{D'v}{c^2})[/itex]

(*) The book I'm reading expressed this equation in terms of an observer in S reading the times off clocks synchronised in S' and getting:

[itex]\Delta t = \frac{D'v}{c^2}[/itex]

Which seems to me an odd way to express things and I think this confused me somewhat. Hopefully, I've now understood this simultaneity issue?

It is easier to start in reference frame S in which the rod of proper length ##D'## is moving with relative velocity v. We know that due to Length contraction the length of the rod in S is ##D =D'/\gamma##. Now we boost to S' (the frame in which the rod is at rest) and from the Lorentz transform the time interval is:

##\Delta t' = \gamma(\Delta t - D v /c^2) = \gamma(\Delta t - (D'/\gamma) v /c^2) ##

When measuring the length in S the measurements of the ends of the rod are made simultaneously so ##\Delta t = 0## and the above expression reduces to:

##\Delta t' = \gamma( - (D'/\gamma) v /c^2) = -D' v/c^2##

which is basically the expression in your textbook, other than they have ##\Delta t## rather than ##\Delta t'##. This is the amount the clock at the front of the rod is behind the clock at the rear of rod when viewed simultaneously in S. Note that I am using ##\Delta t'##which is the proper time shown by the clocks at rest with the rod.

It is a little confusing because we are talking about the difference between two clock readings as seen in S when those clocks are not at rest in S. Note that you said
(*) The book I'm reading expressed this equation in terms of an observer in S reading the times off clocks synchronised in S'
If an observer in S reads the times off clocks at rest in his reference frame, then the time interval is ##\Delta t## but if he is reading the times off clocks synchronised in S' and at rest in S' then the time interval is ##\Delta t'##.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, I've definitely got it now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
943
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K