MHB Maximum value of a Quadratic Equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the quadratic equation 12x - 8 - 3x^2 cannot exceed the value of 4. Participants highlight that the equation represents a downward-facing parabola due to its negative leading coefficient, indicating it has a maximum point at its vertex. The vertex can be calculated using the formula x = -b/(2a), leading to the completion of the square method to show that the maximum value is indeed 4. The largest value of the expression occurs when the squared term is zero, confirming that the expression cannot exceed 4. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the properties of quadratic functions in this proof.
thorpelizts
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Prove that 12x-8-3x^2 can never be greater than 4.

How do you prove? Do you find he discriminant? But isn't discriminant for roots only not equations?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't know what kind of proof you teacher or professor requires for this so can you provide some context for the course?

Otherwise I would say in general that a quadratic function with a negative leading coefficient is a parabola that faces downward and has a maximum point at the vertex.

If the formula for a parabola is given in the form [math]y=ax^2+bx+c[/math] then the vertex is [math]x=-\frac{b}{2a}[/math]. Again this requires some context for the course.
 
thorpelizts said:
Prove that 12x-8-3x^2 can never be greater than 4.

How do you prove? Do you find he discriminant? But isn't discriminant for roots only not equations?

This is the standard non-calculus method for finding the maximum/minimum of a quadratic expression:

You first complete the square to get:

\[-3x^2+12x-8=-3(x-2)^2+12-8=-3(x-2)^2 +4\]

Now since the largest \(-3(x-2)^2\) can be is zero the largest the whole thing can be is \(+4\).

CB
 
Last edited:
thorpelizts said:
Prove that 12x-8-3x^2 can never be greater than 4.

How do you prove? Do you find he discriminant? But isn't discriminant for roots only not equations?
It should be recognized as a negative parabola so your job is to find the vertical coordinate of the maximum turning point. Several methods have already been suggested.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top