Maximum velocity on a banking curve formula

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 10K views
oranboron
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/mechanics/imgmech/carbank.gif

I had a problem in my textbook asking me to find the maximum velocity for a car turning on a banked curve.

After i drew my freebody diagram i had the same formula for centripetal force as hyperphysics above (Fx).

However when i tried getting my result my answer was wrong... I didn't know what i was doing wrong so i searched hyperphyics and found their vmax formula turned incredibly different from mine. Then i saw that they had a second equation. I was able to finally figure out that they isolated for the normal force, n = mg/(costheta - usintheta) in Fy and substituted it into the Fx formula.

BUT the value for the normal force is different from what i had before. I had n = mgcostheta

Why couldn't i use that value for N in my version of Fx = Fcentripetal ?

Thank you for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The normal force would only equal mg cosθ if there were no component of acceleration perpendicular to the incline, which is not the case here.
 
Ok, so if i understand it correctly. Since there is now a net force being applied to the centre and it has a component perpendicular to the incline. This perpendicular force itself is the value of N - mgcosθ ?

Thank you for your patience and help.
 
oranboron said:
Since there is now a net force being applied to the centre and it has a component perpendicular to the incline. This perpendicular force itself is the value of N - mgcosθ ?
Right, that's the component of the net force perpendicular to the incline.