Maximum weight of block m2 for which block m1 will remain at rest

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem involving two blocks, m1 and m2, with static friction and tension forces in equilibrium. Block m1 weighs 851 N, and the coefficient of static friction is 0.24, with an angle theta of 27.6 degrees. Participants clarify how to set up equations for the forces in both the x and y planes, emphasizing that the system is at rest, meaning all forces must sum to zero. The solution involves breaking down the tension forces into their x and y components using trigonometry and applying the correct relationships to find the maximum weight of block m2 that keeps block m1 at rest. Understanding the underlying physics principles is crucial for correctly applying the formulas and arriving at the solution.
shimizua
Messages
99
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


So this was part of a two part thing, the first part was just to find out which statements were true and i figured that out but as far as this i just don't know what to do. this first stuff is for the problem that i already have and it is the second stuff that i need the help with.
a block m1 sits on a table. There is static friction between block and table. Block m2 hangs from a knot, as shown. Call the tension in the rope connecting the knot to m1, "T1". Call the tension in the rope connecting the knot to m2, "T2". Call the tension in the third rope (the one tipped up by an angle theta, connecting the knot to the wall), "T3". The system is in equilibrium.
so this next stuff is what i need the help on
block m1 weighs 851 N. The coefficient of static friction between the block and the table is 0.24 and the angle theta is 27.6o. Find the maximum weight of block m2 for which block m1 will remain at rest
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It would help if we could see a diagram thanks
 
Okay so let's have a look at this. We know the system is at rest, that means that the sum of forces = 0.

All forces in the x = 0 and all forces in y = 0 is a simpler way of looking at it.

So in the x plane we have T1, friction and x component of T3.
in the y plane we have gravity, normal force, T2 and y componenet of T3.

Write out both of these equations equalling to zero and solve.
 
how would you use all of those things to come up with one equation though. so like i know that for a tension with something on a table T1=m1a+m1g and that T2=m2g-m2a. but i don't know about getting any of the other stuff
 
Well it's very simple, turn the worded equations I wrote into algebraic equations:

So in the x plane we have T1, friction and x component of T3.
in the y plane we have gravity, normal force, T2 and y componenet of T3.
 
so it would be Ffric=T1*T3?
and then N=9.8(T2*T3)
 
Whoa slow, down, we have to sum up the forces in each plane (the forces are the ones I mentioned in my quote) and let them equal zero.

Make sure to add them, not multiply.

so, for the x plane (we'll define the right as positive); T3cos(theta) + T1 - Friction = 0
for the y plane (we'll define up as positive); T3sin(theta) + T2 - mg = 0
 
ok and then when we are trying to find what T1, T2, and T3 equals do we use T1=m1a+m1g and that T2=m2g-m2a?
 
  • #10
What would you use as 'a'?
 
  • #11
a/g=m2/(m1+m2) so a=g(m2/(m1+m2))
 
  • #12
What I am saying is; what is 'a'? What is it caused by and what does it affect?
Consider this before you answer, nothing in the system is moving.
 
  • #13
so then a would equal 0 and T1=m1g and T2=m2g?
 
  • #14
oh but since i don't know what m2 is i wouldn't be able to use this to find T2. and also how do i find out what T3 is?
 
  • #15
Sorry you did not answer my question of what you are saying a is. I'm not asking for a mathematical representation of it, I was wondering what you thought caused a.

I can tell you right now that T1 does not = m1g and T2 does not equal m2g.

There are other forces acting. You can see that T1 is going to be the x component of T3 opposing the friction of m1. Right there it tells you that T1 = m1g*friction + T3cos(theta)

T2 = m2g + T3sin(theta).

Please don't try to answer this question until you understand why this is.
All I am doing is summing up the forces in x and y
 
  • #16
ok. i still just don't understand all of what you are telling me. i am not sure really by what you mean when you say x component of T3 opposing the friction of m1
 
  • #17
Ok, just to make sure, do you understand that because T3 is on an angle, we can turn it into two imaginary forces, one along the x axis, and one along the y. When you add these forces together you will get T3.

Now that we have got that, the x component of T3 is pulling towards the right, and subsequently tries to pull T1, as this happens, friction is going to act. However friction is going to act in the opposite direction to the force pulling the block (so it becomes harder to pull).

Therefore the x component of T3 is in the opposite direction to friction caused by m1.
 
  • #18
sorry man i am still very lost. i still do not understand what is meant by x and y component. i remember my teacher talking about it during class but can't recall exactly what it is and how it affects anything
 
  • #19
Okay, let's say that we have a right angled triangle sitting on a graph, where one side is along the x axis, another side is along the y axis, and the hypotenuse is the line that joins the two ends.

You can see that the x-axis and the y-axis combined create the hypotenuse in a relation ship of h2 = x2 + y2

In that same way, if the hypotenuse the direction of a force, it can be broken up into two (or many more) components, that although are not new forces, combine to make the original force we were given.

So we have broken T3 which you can see is not along either x or y axes exclusively into two forces that are along x and y axes.

Using trigonometry, from image you have provided, T3x = T3cos(angle)
and T3y = T3sin(angle)

Now all of the forces in the system are only either in the x plane or the y plane.

We know the system is not moving, therefore all forces in the x plane sum up to 0, as do the forces in the y plane.
Does that make more sense?
 
  • #20
so i was actually able to get the answer. what i did was multiply the weight in N times (tan theta)(coefficient of friction) and that gave me the answer. thanks for all of ur help tonight though man
 
  • #21
I'm intrigued as to how you managed to get to that all of a sudden. You are right in that is what we were getting to if you look at it like this.
Tan(theta) = opposite/adjacent which is the same as yplane/xplane

The weight in this case is the same as the normal reaction force for m1, therefore the retarding force due to friction is normal force * coefficient of static friction, which is what you've done.

By adding in the tan(theta) you have split the force into a ratio of two components.

It's important that you understand why everything is done, rather than blindly applying formulae

EDIT: Hang on I'd better revise this for a second
 
Back
Top