Maxmia-TeXmacs, Case sensitivity

  • Thread starter Thread starter neutrino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sensitivity
AI Thread Summary
A case sensitivity issue in Maxima (5.9.2) when used with WinTeXmacs (1.0.5) results in all output variables being displayed in uppercase, regardless of how they are entered. This has caused confusion and dissatisfaction among users, prompting discussions about potential solutions. Some users have switched to wxMaxima, which does not exhibit this issue, while others have explored using Unix TeXMacs under KUbuntu to avoid the problem altogether. There are reports of connection issues between Maxima and wxMaxima on Ubuntu systems, but the TeXMacs interface appears to function correctly. Suggestions for resolving the issue include modifying the .BAT file in the Maxima bin folder to connect it to wxMaxima. Overall, users express a desire for a more elegant solution to maintain the preferred interface and formatting capabilities of TeXMacs while using Maxima.
neutrino
Messages
2,091
Reaction score
2
Could someone please help me resolve this case sensitivity issue when running a session of Maxima(5.9.2) on WinTeXmacs(1.0.5). The output is always is in the upper case even though I entered the variables in the lower case. Are there are any patches to fix this problem ?

Any help will be appreciated.

-------

Navneeth
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
I don't use Maxmia-TeXmacs, so I don't really know how to solve it. But I don't think it'll cause you lots of troubles just by capitalizing the variables...
I often use Maxmia-wxMaxima. You can check it out http://wxmaxima.sourceforge.net/ (The latest version is 0.6.4). It's pretty good, though. And by the way, the output it gives is not in upper-case. :wink:
 


I still have the same dilemma, with Maxima 5.9.3 and the native windows port of WinTexMacs 1.0.5. This particular configuration leads to all output variables being displayed as uppercase, which is both ugly and confusing. For a while, I had switched to Axiom just to take advantage of the nicer output formatting, but I prefer Maxima for ease of use and familiarity.

Unfortunately, I have not found an obvious work-around, and so I installed Unix TeXMacs under KUbuntu 6.06, which I run under windows with the free VMWare Player, so no rebooting is necessary. While not particularly economical on hard drive space, it is not much worse than installing Cygwin or CygTeXMacs under windows. Curiously enough, the on-line forums have seen some discussion of problems with Maxima under Ubuntu (or KUbuntu), with both xMaxima and wxMaxima failing to connect to the console app. However, the TeXMacs interface does not seem to share this problem, attributed to the underlying lisp compiler.

If someone has found a more elegant solution that would allow me to use the WinTeXMacs port, I would be grateful. I think TeXMacs is a magnificent interface that puts even the Mathematica front-end to shame, but the typesetting quality of mathematical output and the ability to intersperse text, code, and output in notebook format are the reasons for using the interface in the first place.
 
I don't use WinTexmacs. I runs pretty slowly on my computer, and for some weird reason, it cannot open Maxima session... :confused:
I use wxMaxima instead. It works pretty well for me. There's only one small irritable fact is that, when the line of the output is long, it doesn't split it into smaller ones (like Mathematica), instead, it gives you a line long, which is very ugly, and hard-to-see. :frown:
atul said:
...Curiously enough, the on-line forums have seen some discussion of problems with Maxima under Ubuntu (or KUbuntu), with both xMaxima and wxMaxima failing to connect to the console app.
IIRC, you should browse the .BAT file in Maxima\bin folder or something like that. Then connect it to wxMaxima, and it'll be fine. :)
 
In my discussions elsewhere, I've noticed a lot of disagreement regarding AI. A question that comes up is, "Is AI hype?" Unfortunately, when this question is asked, the one asking, as far as I can tell, may mean one of three things which can lead to lots of confusion. I'll list them out now for clarity. 1. Can AI do everything a human can do and how close are we to that? 2. Are corporations and governments using the promise of AI to gain more power for themselves? 3. Are AI and transhumans...
Thread 'ChatGPT Examples, Good and Bad'
I've been experimenting with ChatGPT. Some results are good, some very very bad. I think examples can help expose the properties of this AI. Maybe you can post some of your favorite examples and tell us what they reveal about the properties of this AI. (I had problems with copy/paste of text and formatting, so I'm posting my examples as screen shots. That is a promising start. :smile: But then I provided values V=1, R1=1, R2=2, R3=3 and asked for the value of I. At first, it said...
Back
Top